Criminal Injuries Compensation in Excess of £170,000 Secured on Appeal

News

22/09/2021

On 15th September 2021, William Dean represented an injured person before the First-tier Tribunal (Social Entitlement Chamber) on his appeal against a decision of the Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority.

The appellant had been injured in a serious unprovoked attack with a weapon. He suffered a brain injury and lost the ability to work. After a review, the CICA made an offer of compensation of £21,488. On appeal to the Tribunal, further expert assessment was directed and evidence was obtained from consultants in neurology and psychiatry.

William acted for the Appellant at the appeal hearing and argued that a greater sum was merited. He contended for a higher tariff award for the injury itself as well as for lost earnings and special expenses.

After hearing the arguments, the Tribunal made an award of just over £174,000.

William regularly advises on, and acts in appeals against, decisions of the CICA. He is a contributor to Criminal Injuries Compensation Claims (2nd edition), the leading textbook in the area. In this appeal, he was instructed by Ben Davey of Dean Wilson LLP.

Featured Counsel

William Dean

Call 2011

Latest News & Events

The Dekagram: 14th September 2026

This week John Schmitt considers JBX v Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust [2026] EWHC 2294 (KB), a recent High Court decision on a ‘lost years’ claim brought by a child, whilst Bethany Hutchison takes a look at a case on ADR and indemnity costs. Quantifying…

Congratulations to Julia Brechtelsbauer on her appointment as APIL Junior Litigators’ Group Coordinator

We are delighted to share that Julia Brechtelsbauer has been appointed as a Junior Litigators’ Group Coordinator for the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers (APIL). In this role, Julia will help facilitate and chair group meetings, encourage engagement among members, contribute ideas and content for…

Burgess v Sikorski: deputyship fees in Fatal Accidents Act claims

By Susanna Bennett The High Court decision of Burgess v Sikorski is novel because the court addressed for the first time whether professional deputyship fees were recoverable in a Fatal Accidents Act case in which two dependants were protected beneficiaries. The answer of Mr Justice…

© Deka Chambers 2026

Search

Portfolio Builder

Select the expertise that you would like to download or add to the portfolio

Download    Add to portfolio   
Portfolio
Title Type CV Email

Remove All

Download


Click here to share this shortlist.
(It will expire after 30 days.)