11/09/2020
Yesterday Sarah Prager was joined by Jatinder Paul of Irwin Mitchell, solicitor for the Claimant in the recent case of Griffiths v TUI UK Limited, which has changed the legal landscape in gastric claims.
They discussed the case and its implications for practitioners working in travel law and more generally, and assessed what the decision means for parties seeking to rely on or to challenge uncontroverted expert evidence.
If you missed it, you can view it here
Our next webinar is taking place next Thursday when Nick Yell and Lisa Dobie will explore Tackling Issues of Consent and Material Contribution in the Clinical Context.
The Supreme Court has ruled that claims for compensation by a man who killed three people, but was acquitted by a jury in the Crown Court on the grounds of insanity, are barred by the doctrine of illegality. The Claimant, Mr Lewis-Ranwell, sought damages from…
In this week’s Dekagram Dominique Smith examines a recent decision of the Court of Appeal considering and endorsing 90:10 split liability offers (contrary to the received wisdom following the decision of the High Court in Mundy v TUI [2023] EWHC 385 (Ch); and Robbie Parkin…
Kerry analyses Paul v Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust and the Supreme Court’s attempt to impose coherence on decades of caselaw from McLoughlin, Alcock and Frost through Walters, Shorter and Ronayne. She then asks the hard question for modern travel law practitioners: what, if anything, can claimants do…
Deka Chambers: 5 Norwich Street, London EC4A 1DR