11/09/2020
Yesterday Sarah Prager was joined by Jatinder Paul of Irwin Mitchell, solicitor for the Claimant in the recent case of Griffiths v TUI UK Limited, which has changed the legal landscape in gastric claims.
They discussed the case and its implications for practitioners working in travel law and more generally, and assessed what the decision means for parties seeking to rely on or to challenge uncontroverted expert evidence.
If you missed it, you can view it here
Our next webinar is taking place next Thursday when Nick Yell and Lisa Dobie will explore Tackling Issues of Consent and Material Contribution in the Clinical Context.
This week we examine an unusual arbitration case involving (or did it?) a foreign limitation period; and another decision on the tension between open justice and protection of commercially sensitive information (we understand, by the way, that on 25th February the Court of Appeal will…
This week we look at two decisions, both of which will be of critical importance to practitioners in pursuance of contested litigation. In one, unusually, without prejudice correspondence was admissible in a case involving fundamental dishonesty; whilst in the other, the court reviewed the authorities…
Following a 5-day liability trial in the High Court in Manchester, the Claimant’s negligence and Human Rights Act claims were dismissed by HHJ Bird sitting as a Judge of the High Court. The Claimant was a Type 1 diabetic who suffered from a history of…
Deka Chambers: 5 Norwich Street, London EC4A 1DR