Ian Stebbings secures Claimant’s discontinuance by successful collateral waiver of privilege argument

Articles

07/02/2019

The Claimant alleged that he had fallen over a temporary road sign. In his CNF he alleged that the time of the accident was 7pm. In his witness statement and Part 18 responses he stated that the accident was between 4-5pm. The timing was crucial as the Defendants did not put any temporary signs out until 6.30pm. Two days before trial the Claimants solicitors sought to adduce both a witness statement and a manuscript document which were the solicitors notes of the original conference which gave rise to the timing on the CNF. They made an application for late inclusion of the witness statement and the manuscript document. Defence Counsel, Mr. Stebbings, made an application at the trial that the disclosure of the privileged material was a collateral waiver of privilege and therefore any other privilege documents which went to the issue in question (the timings) were also disclosable. The District Judge agreed and stated he would make such an order for disclosure. Claimant’s Counsel sought time to take instructions and upon return discontinued the claim.

Latest News & Events

Deka Chambers is delighted to announce that Eleanor Mawrey has been awarded the rank of King’s Counsel

It is with great pleasure that Deka Chambers announces that Eleanor Mawrey has been appointed as King’s Counsel in the Ministry of Justice’s new Silk appointments published today, 23rd of January 2026.   Eleanor Mawrey is an experienced barrister practising in serious crime and is ranked in the Financial…

Thom Dyke prosecutes dangerous rapist sentenced to 30 years’ imprisonment

Thom Dyke was instructed by the CPS to prosecute a man accused of a nine-year campaign of rape and sexual abuse against his young daughter.  He was convicted after standing trial at the Crown Court at Croydon last September.   Passing a sentence of thirty years’ imprisonment,…

Success for Andrew Warnock KC, Jack Harding and Gurion Taussig in the Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has ruled that claims for compensation by a man who killed three people, but was acquitted by a jury in the Crown Court on the grounds of insanity, are barred by the doctrine of illegality. The Claimant, Mr Lewis-Ranwell, sought damages from…

© Deka Chambers 2026

Search

Portfolio Builder

Select the expertise that you would like to download or add to the portfolio

Download    Add to portfolio   
Portfolio
Title Type CV Email

Remove All

Download


Click here to share this shortlist.
(It will expire after 30 days.)