07/02/2019
The Claimant alleged that he had fallen over a temporary road sign. In his CNF he alleged that the time of the accident was 7pm. In his witness statement and Part 18 responses he stated that the accident was between 4-5pm. The timing was crucial as the Defendants did not put any temporary signs out until 6.30pm. Two days before trial the Claimants solicitors sought to adduce both a witness statement and a manuscript document which were the solicitors notes of the original conference which gave rise to the timing on the CNF. They made an application for late inclusion of the witness statement and the manuscript document. Defence Counsel, Mr. Stebbings, made an application at the trial that the disclosure of the privileged material was a collateral waiver of privilege and therefore any other privilege documents which went to the issue in question (the timings) were also disclosable. The District Judge agreed and stated he would make such an order for disclosure. Claimant’s Counsel sought time to take instructions and upon return discontinued the claim.
Much of children law involves the exploration of the facts relating to the child’s care and welfare, often coloured by the complex relationship dynamics between the adult protagonists. Occasionally, however, the facts which need to be established can be more fundamental. In John v Jane…
By Laura Hibberd Re E (A Child) (Special Guardianship Order: Public Law Proceedings) [2026] EWCA Civ 1167 Special guardianship orders are often thought of as the “middle ground” of permanence: more secure than a care order, less final than adoption, and with the child’s legal…
By Tim Parker KC The President of the Family Division handed down judgment on 29th September 2026 the decision in the first appeal following the introduction of Child-Focused Courts pilot. In Re C (Child Arrangements Orders; Domestic Abuse; Child Focused Court) [2026] EWCA Civ 1216…
Deka Chambers: 5 Norwich Street, London EC4A 1DR