Last week JPIL published Sabrina Hartshorn‘s article on recovery of investment advice and the discount rate in Issue 1 2018. The Response to the Report of the Justice Select Committee appears to now add a degree of clarity to the question of management costs, investment advice and the recovery of investment advice.
Sabrina’s interpretation of investment management costs as detailed in the draft Schedule A1 to include investment advice appears to have been the same interpretation made by the Committee within its recommendations to the Government (paragraph 91). The question relating to professional costs could be left to the courts to develop as a matter of case law but it could be taken forward by other means. The Government will consider the issue (the most appropriate way to take into account advice and management costs) directly or through a third party but considers that the most appropriate forum for considering the recovery of professional advice as a separate head of damage should be the decision of the court and not the Panel (paragraph 95).
Edward Lamb KC and Tara Vindis, instructed by Enfield Legal Services, successfully defended an appeal that dealt with the retraction of allegations; burdens of proof and deficiencies in investigatory procedures relating to allegations of sexual abuse within a family. Tara Vindis was instructed for the…
We have some wonderful rankings and testimonials for our barristers in the 2025 edition of Legal 500, launched last week. We were delighted that our clerking team also received a great deal of recognition too: We were also thrilled to be shortlisted for Clerking Team…
On 20th September 2024 HHJ Melissa Clarke, sitting as a High Court Judge, handed down Judgment in this case. Giles Mooney KC, instructed by Angela Batchelor of Irwin Mitchell, appeared for Mr Wilson at the quantum trial which had been heard over 5 days in…
Deka Chambers: 5 Norwich Street, London EC4A 1DR