Welcome to the Deka Chambers January Briefing where we draw once again upon our multi-disciplinary expertise to deliver a series of articles which examine key themes in litigation. For this edition we consider Best Evidence. Success at trial is often as much about enabling clients…
This week on Halloween we scared ourselves by reading judges’ comments on the late provision of skeleton arguments and on when and if remote hearings are appropriate; and considered a case involving Thomas Cook Airlines, reaching out from beyond the grave and seeking orders concerning…
This week the team has taken time out of its celebrations marking Matthew Chapman KC and Sarah Prager KC’s victories in the latest cases on Spanish penalty interest and the Montreal Convention respectively, to consider what can be done where a claimant refuses to undergo…
Max Melsa represented the children, through their Children’s Guardian, in the first case to reach the Court of Appeal specifically dealing with the interpretation of Hair-Strand Tests in care proceedings. The appeal was made by the mother against the interim separation of three children from…
This week the team’s been glued to the telly, and in particular SupremeCourtTV, following the progress of Griffiths v TUI as it wends towards its conclusion. Truth be told, we’ve been mildly surprised by the lack of fanfare around the hearing, given that the decision…
In this week’s Dekagram we consider recent cases which raise some urgent questions around how the QOCS and whiplash tariff systems are working. And speaking of urgent questions, we encourage readers to get their questions on health tourism and cross border clinical negligence ready –…
Max Melsa was instructed by Bedfordshire Police, who were an Interested Party in the Inquest regarding the death of police officer Sean Duignan on 31st May 2021. Click the below link for the media coverage: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-beds-bucks-herts-63620922
Max Melsa was instructed to represent Bedfordshire Police as an Interested Party in the Inquest of Harper Denton and comments upon the role of Violent Offender Orders If you have never come across Violent Offender Orders (‘VOOs’), then you can be forgiven. However, they are…
Max Melsa represented the Claimant in a claim for personal injury within which the Defendant raised the unusual defence of automatism. The defence, which requires the Defendant to show on the balance of probabilities that the Defendant’s actions were wholly involuntary, was raised following a…
John Foy QC, Edwin Buckett and Max Melsa have been published in this month’s edition of PI Focus, APIL’s monthly newsletter, regarding amputation claims and claims under the Montreal Convention respectively. Members of APIL are able to access the articles here: https://www.apil.org.uk/login.aspx?return-url= https://www.apil.org.uk/pi-focus
Max Melsa successfully represented the Claimant, who suffered a serious fall when embarking from Bristol Airport. The claim was brought under Article 17 of the Montreal Convention 1999, which applies in cases where injury is sustained either on board an aircraft or in the course…
Today Max Melsa Amelia Katz and Lucy Lodewyke presented a Personal Injury Webinar on Whiplash Reforms, Causation and Fundamental Dishonesty. The tightly focussed one hour session introduced and analysed developments in:- 1. Whiplash Reforms; 2. Causation issues; 3. Fundamental dishonesty. An accompanying booklet was prepared and is available in PDF form…
Deka Chambers: 5 Norwich Street, London EC4A 1DR