The areas of work in which we have particular expertise, experience and excellence.
Call: 1997 Silk: 2018
"One of the finest advocates currently practising at the Criminal Bar."
Chambers & Partners 2023
As Senior Treasury Counsel, Tom Little KC regularly prosecutes some of the country’s most high-profile cases.
This includes the murder of Jo Cox MP, the kidnap, rape and murder of Sarah Everard and the murder of Sir David Amess MP. He has also prosecuted a number of well known individuals for historic sexual offending. They include Max Clifford and Lord Ahmed of Rotherham. In 2021 Tom won Crime Silk of the Year at the Chambers UK Bar Awards.
Tom frequently appears in the Court of Appeal and Supreme Court in cases of general public importance (such as R v Hunter & others, R v Golds, R (Belhaj) v DPP and FCO, R v Umerji and R v Plaku). Tom has also undertaken a significant amount of work for the Serious Fraud Office and is equally adept prosecuting or defending in such cases.
In addition to his heavy criminal and fraud practice Tom undertakes a wide range of civil work. In particular judicial review proceedings both for Defendants and also Claimants as well as Inquests and Inquiries. He is currently Counsel to the Inquest into the death of Yassar Yaqub. He also provides strategic advice to liquidators and creditors on the interplay between civil and criminal proceedings where there is suspected fraud as well as regulatory cases in various tribunals.
Tom has conducted more than fifty homicide trials as well as the full range of other serious criminal cases most notably terrorism and sexual offences. He regularly appears in high-profile cases both at Old Bailey and also in the Court of Appeal. He has particular expertise in cases involving expert evidence and also in the handling and use of highly sensitive material (where he combines his experience as both Treasury Counsel and the Special Advocate). However, it is as an appellate advocate that he is particularly well-renowned. He is frequently instructed on appeal in cases that he was not involved at first instance either in appeals where unrelated cases are listed together to address matters of general public importance or as an amicus appointed by the Attorney General to assist the Court on difficult legal issues.
R v Ali Harbi Ali
Successfully prosecuted case relating to the murder of Sir David Amess MP who was stabbed to death in a church whilst meeting constituents.
R v Nazir Ahmed and two others
Successfully prosecuted Lord Ahmed of Rotherham and his two brothers for historic sexual offending.
R v Couzens (2021)
Prosecuted serving Met Police officer Wayne Couzens for the kidnap, rape and murder of Sarah Everard.
R v Umerji (2021)  EWCA Crim 598
Tom successfully represented the Prosecution in the Court of Appeal in case involving complex arguments of statutory construction as to whether a defendant must be present at their section 51 hearing in the Magistrates’ Court when sent to the Crown Court for an indictable only offence.
R v Vyas (2020)
Successfully prosecuted serial stranger rapist whose attacks involved increasing violence culminating in the murder of the last victim.
R v Bater-James and Mohammed (2020)  2 Cr. App. R. 20
Successfully appeared just in the Court of Appeal to represent the prosecution in two conjoined appeals so that guidance could be given on the correct approach to the obtaining of, searching and disclosure of the content of mobile telephones of complainants.
R v Weir (2019)  EWCA Crim 638
Successfully prosecuted double murder trial that made legal history. The defendant had previously had his conviction for murder quashed by the Court of Appeal in 2000. Tom represented the DPP in the application to quash the acquittal under the double jeopardy provisions in light of new DNA evidence and then he prosecuted both that and another murder at trial.
R v Godinho (2019)
Defended in murder trial in which the Defendant killed his wife by repeatedly stabbing her in front of their 3 year old daughter close to the primary school at which their other children attended.
R v PY  1 WLR 3249 and R v SA & others  EWCA Crim 144
Appeared as an amicus appointed by the Attorney General to assist the Court of Appeal in two unrelated cases relating to the procedural requirements necessary before the Prosecution can make a terminatory ruling appeal to the Court of Appeal.
R v Mackinlay and others (2018)  UKSC 42;  3 WLR 556
Successfully appeared for the Prosecution in the Supreme Court on the meaning of election expenses and in particular that there is no requirement for property, goods, services or facilities transferred to or provided for the use or benefit of a candidate free of charge or at a discount.
R v Watt (2018)
Successfully prosecuted double jeopardy rape case having previously appeared in the Court of Appeal to quash the defendant’s acquittal for an offence of attempted rape dating back to 1989.
R v Ulla (2017)
Successfully prosecuted so-called ‘Jihadi James Bond’ for various terrorism offences linked to cyber terrorism.
Tom’s judicial review practice is primarily (but not exclusively) based on claims with a link or association to the criminal justice system – notably challenges to prosecutorial decisions and challenges to investigative decisions. He regularly advises the DPP on high-profile challenges to his decisions and policies as well as also advising the Attorney General on public law issues arising from her functions including her superintendence functions.
DPP v Cuciurean (2022)
Tom successfully appeared for the DPP in this important case involving consideration of the Supreme Court decision of Ziegler v DPP and its application to other offences committed in the course of protesting.
R (Jabber) v The Crown Court sitting at Sheffield (2022)
Tom successfully resisted this claim for judicial review which turned on a question of statutory construction relating to the expiry of a custody time limit.
R (EVAW) v DPP (2019 - 2021)  2 Cr. App. R. 2
Successfully represented the DPP in landmark and high profile public law challenge in both the Divisional Court and Court of Appeal as to whether the CPS had changed its policy as to whether there is sufficient evidence to prosecute rape cases.
McCourt v Parole Board (2020)  A.C.D. 127
Represented the Claimant in two day judicial review challenging the Parole Board’s decision to release Ian Simms. He was convicted of murdering Claimant’s daughter – Helen McCourt in 1989 but still refuses to say where her body is. Tom’s submission as to the standing to bring the proceedings were accepted by the Court and represent important clarity on that issue for the families of other victims.
R (McKenzie) v Lord Chancellor, DPP and the Lord Chief Justice (2020)  4 W.L.R. 106
Successfully represented the DPP in a challenge to the legality of the suspension of jury trials following the COVID 19 pandemic.
El Gizouli v SSHD and DPP (2019 - 2020)  EWHC 2516 (Admin)
Successfully represented DPP in two judicial review challenges to the decision making of the DPP and the provision of documentation to the USA relating to the notorious ISIS Beatles.
R (Slade and Baxter) v The Attorney General and DPP (2018)  A.C.D. 24
Successfully appeared for the Attorney General in important public law case relating to the extent of the superintendence function of the Attorney General over the DPP.
R (Belhaj) v The DPP & Secretary of State for Foreign & Commonwealth Affairs (2017-2018)  UKSC 33;  3 WLR 435
Appeared for the DPP in preliminary issue hearing in both the Divisional Court and the Supreme Court relating to the availability of Closed Material Proceedings in a judicial review claim relating to a decision not to prosecute.
Rabbani v DPP  2 Cr. App. R. 28
Successfully responded to this appeal by way of Case Stated in the Divisional Court relating to the obligations on the Police relating to the use of the Schedule 7 powers to ask questions at Airports and ports. In particular, the Court considered the duties relating to searching for confidential information on electronic devices.
Both as a junior but also in Silk Tom has advised on and appeared in a number of high-profile and complex fraud cases not just for the SFO but also for the CPS. He is also often brought in to advise on discrete legal issues arising in these cases both for the Prosecution and the Defence as well as appearing just in appellate proceedings in these cases.
(2020) Advising on underlying criminality relating to overseas restraint order involving alleged criminality also occurring outside the jurisdiction and whether the conduct alleged amounts to any criminal offence in this jurisdiction.
R v Umerji and Allad (2018 – 2021)
Appearing for Prosecution in both complex appeal and confiscation proceedings relating to Defendants who are absconders in multi-million pound MTIC fraud.
R v Ryjenko & Sanderson (2014 – 2019)
Successfully prosecuted multi-million cross-jurisdiction corruption and money-laundering trial relating to the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development.
Re LIBOR (2015 - 2018)
Advising SFO on alleged LIBOR rigging at RBS.
Tom has for many years undertaken a whole range of Inquest work. In 2021 he was appointed as counsel to the Inquest touching the death of Yassar Yaqub. In addition he was counsel to Dame Heather Hallett’s Review into the Government’s ‘on the runs scheme’ following the Good Friday Agreement and he regularly advises on the interplay between criminal investigations and Inquires. He has recently advised in that context in relation to the Grenfell Tower and Brooke House Inquiries as well as appearing for both the DPP and the Attorney General in the Undercover Police Inquiry.
Regulated by the Bar Standards Board (BSB)
Regulated by the Bar Standards Board (BSB) and holds a current practising certificate. To see my privacy notice click here.
"He's supremely confident, ice cool and a man with phenomenal judgement."
Chambers & Partners 2023
"Tom is a really experienced appellate advocate, and his preparation is second to none."
Legal 500 2023
"Tom is masterful of the facts of a case and his submissions are articulate and carefully considered by the High Court. Judges trust and like him and listen attentively to his submissions."
Legal 500 2023
"A phenomenon. He is a brilliant lawyer with a razor-sharp mind."
Legal 500 2021
"A wonderful trial lawyer"
Chambers UK 2021
Chambers UK 2020
"A very fine appellate advocate"
Chambers UK 2021
"Juries like him as he leads them through complicated evidence with great aplomb"
Chambers UK 2021
"A phenomenon. He is a brilliant lawyer with a razor-sharp mind, who is able to crunch through complex problems, apply a breadth and depth of legal knowledge to them and come to a clearly expressed answer."
Legal 500 Administrative and Public Law 2021
"A very fine appellate advocate." "Juries like him as he leads them through complicated evidence with great aplomb. He performs so well under pressure and never shows any undue emotion, however fraught things get." "A wonderful trial lawyer."
Chambers UK Crime 2021
"A stylish and well-prepared advocate who pays great attention to detail."
Legal 500 Crime (General Crime) 2021
"Very impressive on paper."
Chambers UK Financial Crime 2021
"Someone you can trust to go through things with a fine-tooth comb; if there's something to find, he'll find it." "He is incredibly bright and has a very good practice."
Chambers UK Crime 2020
"A very good advocate" who is "absolutely brilliant."
Chambers UK Financial Crime 2020
"A real team player and leaves no stone unturned"
Legal 500 Financial Crime 2020
"The man to go to for criminal-related legal argument in the Court of Appeal and divisional court."
Legal 500 Crime (General Crime) 2019
"He has a truly encyclopaedic knowledge of the law and the ability to apply that to the most complicated factual situations."
Legal 500 Fraud: Crime 2019
Click here to share this shortlist.
(It will expire after 30 days.)