The areas of work in which we have particular expertise, experience and excellence.
Kyah Mufti undertakes work across the range of Chambers’ practice areas, with a particular focus on family law (both public and private) and criminal law.
With an academic background in human rights, Kyah also has a keen interest in public law and international law.
As someone concerned by issues of access to justice, Kyah acts for families in inquests on a pro bono or heavily reduced fee basis. In her first year of tenancy, Kyah represented the family of a deceased young man in a two week jury inquest in Portsmouth in which the other Interested Persons were all corporate parties represented by very senior counsel, as well as the Health and Safety Executive.
Kyah has extensive experience of acting in remote court hearings, including contested multi-day matters. She operates an entirely paperless practice.
Prior to coming to the Bar, Kyah worked with young and vulnerable persons in a number of roles in the charity sector. As a caseworker for a children’s legal charity, Kyah acted as a youth advocate in meetings with social services and schools, supporting young people in specifying their housing, educational, and care challenges with a view to securing better provisions for their needs.
Kyah also spent two years working alongside prison officers to manage a programme for children and young adults in Young Offender Institutions and prisons in London.
Kyah is able to speak conversational Urdu.
Kyah is an experienced junior family practitioner acting in both private and public law proceedings, including fact-findings and contested final hearings. She is regularly instructed in cases dealing with allegations of physical and psychological violence, sexual abuse, neglect and parental substance misuse issues.
Kyah has also acted in cases involving vulnerable children who are victims of child sexual exploitation and grooming, and related applications for recovery orders or for the deprivation of a child’s liberty in relation to secure accommodation to safeguard them.
Kyah is regularly instructed on behalf of local authorities, parents, and children’s guardians. As someone who also practices in criminal law, Kyah benefits from having a broader perspective in circumstances where there is a concurrent criminal investigation or prosecution alongside family proceedings. She has frequently been instructed to deal with applications for disclosure from family proceedings into criminal investigations.
Kyah particularly enjoys cases which involve other jurisdictions and complex cultural considerations, and she is keen to further develop her interest in international family law.
LB v A 
Kyah acted for the Local Authority throughout these care proceedings which involved adjourning the first final hearing on the third day due to unexpected admissions made in evidence by a parent under cross-examination.
B v H 
Kyah acted for the Respondent Father in private proceedings arising from cross-applications to allow and to prohibit the Father to relocate with the parties’ child. The Father was granted permission to relocate.
A v A 
Kyah acted for the Respondent Wife in an appeal brought by the Appellant Husband against a consent order made at the conclusion of financial remedy proceedings the previous year. The appeal was dismissed.
C v C 
Kyah acted for the Respondent in a non-molestation order application in which her client had a diagnosis of multiple personality disorder and the medical view on whether the Respondent could properly understand the nature and existence of the order at all times was ambiguous.
LB v S 
Kyah acted for a Mother in this final hearing with a Child Arrangements Order being made to her client
LB v A 
Kyah acted for a Father with acute cognitive difficulties who was represented by the Official Solicitor. He required an intermediary at court, and regular breaks, in order to follow the interim care order hearing, which included evidence and findings of fact.
TH v JG 
Kyah appeared in a final hearing in the High Court representing one of two parents in a dispute regarding their child’s medical treatment.
Kyah’s previous career working with vulnerable persons, youths, and persons in custody, has naturally drawn her to Court of Protection work. She is a member of Chambers’ Court of Protection team and has been instructed in a number of s21A MCA 2005 applications and DOL applications. Kyah is keen to grow her Court of Protection practice and is therefore open to instructions both within, and outside of, London.
Re: SM 
Kyah represented a Local Authority in this case considering the capacity of P in relation to contact, and whether the court could aprove the restrictions sought by the supported accomodation in which P lives.
Re: GL 
Kyah represented the Rule 1.2 representative and litigation friend for GL in this DOLS application by a County Council.
LBN v H 
Kyah acted for the Applicant in this DOL application with respect to a child at risk of child sexual exploitation and grooming.
SM v LBE 
Kyah acted for the Respondent in this s21 MCA application by an Applicant with varying capacity from day to day.
Kyah is a CPS Grade 2 prosecutor, who regularly both prosecutes and defends in the Crown Court.
Kyah also undertakes work for authorities in cash forfeiture and POCA proceedings.
Kyah has a broader interest in international criminal law, following the international law component of her MSc Human Rights.
R v H (Woolwich Crown Court) 
Kyah acted as disclosure junior in the successful prosecution of twenty conspirators within an Organised Criminal Network which engaged in the supply of significant quantities of class A and B controlled drugs.
R v Ad and Others (Westminster Magistrates Court) 
R v Ad and Others (Westminster Magistrates Court) : Kyah represented one of three defendants who were prosecuted in the fourth ever case brought by OFSTED for the offence of conducting an unregistered school. The case was heard before the Chief Magistrate and received media attention.
Kyah represented the Trustee of the charity under which the institution operated, successfully distinguishing her client’s role and conduct from that of the other defendants.
R v YR (Guildford Crown Court) 
Kyah successfully defended her client, who was acquitted of Burglary (non dwelling) and Blackmail.
R v CA (Magistrates' Court) 
Kyah’s client was acquitted of two counts of Assault PC and one charge of Obstruct PC.
R v M (Magistrates' Court) 
Kyah successfully prosecuted a defendant charged with Racially Aggravated Harassment.
R v W (Magistrates’ Court) 
Kyah successfully prosecuted a defendant charged with assault in a domestic context.
Regulated by the Bar Standards Board (BSB)
Regulated by the Bar Standards Board (BSB) and holds a current practising certificate. To see my privacy notice click here.
Click here to share this shortlist.
(It will expire after 30 days.)