After previously striking out the claimant’s libel claim against the first defendant, the High Court struck out a false imprisonment claim against the first defendant as there were no reasonable grounds for bringing it. Mrs Justice Williams also struck out a data protection claim as there were no reasonable grounds for bringing that claim and its pursuit would be an abuse of process. The court also refused the claimant’s applications to amend his claim to add a claim in false imprisonment against further defendants and for them to be added to the proceedings for that purpose, to add a new claim of conspiracy against the defendant and proposed defendants, and to add a data protection claim against one of the proposed defendants
Simon Butler and Anirudh Mandagere acted on behalf of the Second and Third Defendants. They were instructed by Advocate.
By Susanna Bennett The High Court decision of Burgess v Sikorski is novel because the court addressed for the first time whether professional deputyship fees were recoverable in a Fatal Accidents Act case in which two dependants were protected beneficiaries. The answer of Mr Justice…
We are pleased to share that Susanna Bennett has returned from parental leave and is available to take instructions. Susanna has a busy practice comprising civil claims and inquests concerning alleged failures in medical treatment, together with duty of care claims brought against employers, occupiers,…
This week Sarah Prager KC reports on the ongoing CMA investigation into drip pricing, and takes inspiration from a recent trip to the cinema to see The Odyssey when considering the ongoing EC review of the operation of the recast Brussels Regulation. The Competition and…
Deka Chambers: 5 Norwich Street, London EC4A 1DR