The unusual case involved two siblings who were placed in separate placements, and whether one of the siblings should be placed with the other, or remain in her foster placement. As McKendrick J found, this was one of the limited cases where siblings were not to be placed together for adoption.
The case also dealt with post-adoption contact orders and whether section 51A of the Adoption and Children Act 2002 or section 8 of the Children Act 1989 should apply.
The judgment can be found here.
Anirudh Mandagere is representing the Secretary of State for the Home Department as an interested party in judicial review proceedings. This judicial review concerns whether Article 8 ECHR or the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child imposes obligations on public authorities to…
The 18th edition of the Judicial College Guidelines for the Assessment of General Damages in Personal Injury Cases will be published on 9th April. Stuart McKechnie KC of Deka Chambers is a co-editor of the Guidelines. The Guidelines for the Assessment of General Damages is designed…
This week brought the news we’ve all been waiting for – yes, the proposed amendments to the Package Travel and Linked Travel Arrangements Regulations 2018 have finally been published! The Package Travel and Linked Travel Arrangements (Amendment) Regulations 2026 As well as being every bit…
Deka Chambers: 5 Norwich Street, London EC4A 1DR