Thom Dyke was instructed by the CPS to prosecute a man accused of a nine-year campaign of rape and sexual abuse against his young daughter. He was convicted after standing trial at the Crown Court at Croydon last September.
Passing a sentence of thirty years’ imprisonment, the judge said that the defendant, who was HIV positive and did not use protection when he committed the rapes showed a “reckless and callous disregard” of his daughter. The judge said that this was “as serious an abuse of trust as it is possible to contemplate”.
The judge went on to find the defendant was dangerous, and observed that “…the fact that your paternal relationship did not inhibit you from committing these offences means that I consider there is a very serious risk that you would commit similar offences against other children you came into contact with, where you would not be constrained by the feelings of shame you should have felt when raping your daughter.”
They join us from Great James Street Chambers. Nick is an experienced leading junior, noted for his particular ability to cut through complex issues of fact and law in order to get to the heart of the case. Nick’s practice is in defending clients…
This week Anirudh Mandagere has written a longer briefing on the use by lawyers of artificial intelligence and how to avoid being accused of negligence (it’s not as straightforward as you may think); the link to his briefing is here. Meanwhile Sarah Prager KC draws…
The UK Jurisdiction Taskforce have produced a Legal Statement on Liability for AI Harms. Given that very few cases have reached the courts, the Legal Statement provides much-needed guidance to legal advisors and representatives. In this article Anirudh Mandagere sets out the key aspects of…
Deka Chambers: 5 Norwich Street, London EC4A 1DR