03/04/2025
The First-tier Tribunal (Special Educational Needs and Disability) (the “FTT”) handed down judgment in this matter earlier this year. A claim was brought for victimisation of a Sixth Form school boy (the “Claimant”) following an email from his mother to the headteacher alleging discrimination. The FTT found that six of the seven alleged detriments were time-barred; all seven alleged detriments were further dismissed as not having happened, and (had they happened) not having been motivated by the protected act.
A full summary of the case may be read here.
Susanna Bennett was instructed by Andrew Sheppard at Kennedys Law LLP for the successful respondent.
This week Anirudh Mandagere gives us the most lucid explanation we have yet seen of the decision of the Supreme Court in Attorney General for Northern Ireland’s Reference [2026] UKSC 16 relating to deprivation of liberty. We also bring news, from Robbie Parkin and Dominique…
The recent ruling by the Supreme Court has reversed over a decade of understanding deprivation of liberty. This Dekinar focuses on the impact of the judgment for those involved in Court of Protection proceedings as well as practical tips on how to navigate the new…
Written by experienced members of the Deka Chambers Clinical Negligence Practice Group, the 5th edition of Clinical Negligence Claims: A Practical Guide provides a valuable reference source for clinical negligence practitioners, with insights into still developing areas of law. The book covers the intricacies of investigating breach of duty…
Deka Chambers: 5 Norwich Street, London EC4A 1DR