Alternative Dispute Resolution Briefing: November 2024

Briefings

21/11/2024

This is the last ADR Bulletin of 2024 and it’s been an incredibly exciting year. There have been wideranging changes to the CPR, bringing the rules in line with the landmark case of Churchill v Merthyr. Bethany Hutchison considers the main provisions, noting that the stage is now set to put ADR “front and centre across the spectrum of civil litigation.”

The Courts have continued to emphasise the importance of engaging in ADR and the costs consequences of unreasonably refusing so to do. Our new tenant, Megan Bithel-Vaughan, provides an overview of the recent caselaw and in particular the Court of Appeal’s decision, earlier this year, in Northamber Plc v Genee World.

As an interesting companion piece to all of this, I would invite readers also to consider the judgment in Invenia Technical Computing Corporation & Ors v Hudson [2024] EWHC 1302. This provides a now rather rare example of a case where the Court did not consider it unreasonable for the Defendant to fail to engage in ADR.

The circumstances are somewhat unusual and indeed rather extreme, as the Claimant was a litigant in person who, the Court found, had “entirely unrealistic views about the merits of his case” and continued, to the end, to make “serious unsubstantiated allegations of wrongdoing” against the Defendant and its lawyers. The mediation offer was put forward only a month before a listed final hearing date; mediation had “no real prospects of success” and “would simply have added another layer of expense for no good purpose.” The fact that it would have put in jeopardy the final hearing date was relevant. The case really turns on its facts although I expect it will be relied upon by entrenched parties to justify non-engagement. The significant takeaway is that it is often a good idea to consider ADR sooner rather than later.

I myself have had a couple of mediations very close to trial this year and, while I don’t necessarily recommend that approach, they were resounding successes. In one of these, a JSM had failed so that the benefits of mediation were plain. I am more of a fan of mediation than ever.

Wishing everyone a peaceful holiday period, although I am well aware we aren’t quite there yet. I look forward to discussing and engaging in much more ADR in 2025.

Laura Elfield, Head of the ADR team

Read the Briefing in full.

Featured Counsel

Laura Elfield

Call 1996

Bethany Hutchison

Call 2021

Latest News & Events

The Dekagram: 8th June 2026

This week Anirudh Mandagere gives us the most lucid explanation we have yet seen of the decision of the Supreme Court in Attorney General for Northern Ireland’s Reference [2026] UKSC 16 relating to deprivation of liberty. We also bring news, from Robbie Parkin and Dominique…

Court of Protection Practice after Attorney General for Northern Ireland’s Reference [2026] UKSC 16

The recent ruling by the Supreme Court has reversed over a decade of understanding deprivation of liberty. This Dekinar focuses on the impact of the judgment for those involved in Court of Protection proceedings as well as practical tips on how to navigate the new…

Clinical Negligence Claims (5th edition) 

Written by experienced members of the Deka Chambers Clinical Negligence Practice Group, the 5th edition of Clinical Negligence Claims: A Practical Guide provides a valuable reference source for clinical negligence practitioners, with insights into still developing areas of law. The book covers the intricacies of investigating breach of duty…

© Deka Chambers 2026

Search

Portfolio Builder

Select the expertise that you would like to download or add to the portfolio

Download    Add to portfolio   
Portfolio
Title Type CV Email

Remove All

Download


Click here to share this shortlist.
(It will expire after 30 days.)