Commercial analysis: The Chartered Trading Standards Institute (CTSI) has called for holiday protections and terms and conditions to be simplified to reduce confusion for consumers. Sarah Prager KC of Deka Chambers considers what the CTSI has called for, the current legal position and its difficulties and the future legislative framework.
What has the CTSI called for?
The Chartered Trading Standards Institute (CTSI) has conducted a survey and discovered that the vast majority of the general public doesn’t know what a linked travel arrangement (LTA) is or does— and 18% of them thought that they gained greater protection from booking an LTA than they would from booking a package holiday (whereas the opposite is in fact the case). Even after they were given the definition of an LTA, just over 73% of respondents said that they still found the difference between that and a package holiday ‘a bit confusing’, or that they ‘didn’t understand it at all’. LTA and package organisers have also expressed confusion about the status of the products they’re selling. The CTSI wants the government to act to simplify the legal framework relating to LTAs and packages and to the provision of information to consumers, and has called for:
For more, see: CTSI calls for Package Travel review and Linked Travel Arrangement Regulations, LNB News 02/06/2023 56.
2. What is the current legal position in the UK in regard to LTAs and package holidays?
The 2018 Package Travel Regs draw a distinction between those holidays booked as packages and those booked as linked travel arrangements, defined in the 2018 Package Travel Regs, SI 2018/634, reg 2 as follows:
Importantly, although the trader owes various duties in relation to linked travel arrangements, 2018
Package Travel Regs, SI 2018/634, reg 15, which imposes liability on the organiser for the proper performance of the contract, applies only to package holidays.
The Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy (now subsumed by the Department for Business and Trade) produced a Guidance for businesses on the application of the LTA which provides helpful information on LTAs and package holidays.
What are the difficulties with the current legislative framework?
The problem identified by the CTSI has been well known to practitioners working in this field since the inception of the Regulations. Consumers, when booking holidays, do not have in mind the minutiae of the regulatory framework, which is simply too complex to be readily understood. Traders owe a duty to explain consumers’ rights and obligations to them prior to the conclusion of the holiday contract, but the range of possible arrangements and their various consequences is so wide that it is difficult for them to comply with this duty, particularly when (as the same survey also found) most consumers do not trouble to read providers’ terms and conditions, believing that it is unnecessary to do so. As a result, a significant number of holidaymakers are taking unprotected or less protected holidays, whilst believing erroneously that they have the full protection of the Regulations. Furthermore, the dividing line between linked travel arrangements and package holidays remains unclear, and the precise consequences of falling on one or other side of that line are also controversial. To this extent the well intentioned provisions of the Regulations have not really provided the consumer protection anticipated, but have instead rendered the legal framework more confusing than it was before.
What will the planned review of the Package Travel and Linked Travel Arrangement Regulations 2018 consider?
The CTSI intends to open a dialogue with government to review the LTA, seeking a simplified approach and clarification on the definition of what an LTA is. It is proposed that it will be made clearer to consumers whether they are booking unprotected, partially protected or fully protected holidays respectively. This will require traders to overhaul the way they sell holidays and to reconsider their terms and conditions, as well as to identify in every case with a high level of certainty the nature of the holiday sold. This may be difficult in cases where holidays are sold dynamically; but the intention of the review is that the entire regime will be simplified so that it can be done more effectively than at present.
This analysis was first published on Lexis+® UK on 17 July 2023 and can be found here (subscription
required).
Max Melsa and Madeleine Miller appeared in the case of Re: F, G and H (Return Home Under Supervision Order) [2026] EWCA Civ 713, involving the making of Supervision Orders and the return of three children to the mother’s care following a rolled up Final Hearing where…
We haven’t brought our readers news from North of the border for some time – this week Imogen Todd examines a Scottish case on the disapplication of qualified one way costs shifting on account of unreasonable conduct, whilst Sarah Prager KC draws attention to a…
We would like to thank our clients and everyone else who supported our seven nominations across three practice areas in the Legal 500 Awards 2026. We extend our warmest congratulations to all the finalists and in particular our six members. The nominations are: Clinical Negligence Gurion…
Deka Chambers: 5 Norwich Street, London EC4A 1DR