Slaughterhouse operator fined for failure to adhere to welfare legislation

News

22/12/2022

Today at Chelmsford Magistrates’ Court, District Judge King fined Shazan Foods Ltd (formerly 1Stop Halal Ltd) for 10 offences of failing to comply with standards set out in animal welfare legislation.

The offences related to incidents on six dates when, at the company’s slaughterhouse at Eye in Suffolk, the carotid arteries of chickens were not cut, or were cut inadequately, with the consequence that some birds entered scalding tanks alive without having first bled out. The company had failed to comply with requirements imposed by the Welfare of Animals at the Time of Killing (England) Regulations 2015 and Regulation (EC) 1099/2009 on the Protection of Animals at the Time of Killing.

After considering the facts and the mitigation, the judge fined the company for each offence. Higher fines were applied for the instances in which there was identifiable pain, suffering or distress beyond the failure to sever the arteries; and the fines increased in value for the subsequent offences, on the basis of the company’s knowledge of the previous incidents.

In total, Shazan Foods Ltd was fined £16,400. Costs and a surcharge were payable additionally.

William Dean prosecuted the case, instructed by Simon Tunnicliffe and George Ward at the Crown Prosecution Service’s Mersey and Cheshire Fraud Unit.

Featured Counsel

William Dean

Call 2011

Latest News & Events

Adam Dawson awarded MBE in King’s Birthday Honours List 2025

Chambers congratulates Adam Dawson upon being awarded an MBE for services to charity and service to the Jewish Community. For over 30 years Adam has been involved in the heart of the Jewish community, leading several charities and organisations. After a year as Chair of…

The Dekagram: 9th June 2025

This week Russell Wilcox and Thomas Clarke examine whether in applications to set aside default judgment there exists such a thing as a ‘co-defendant principle’; essential reading for all practitioners. Co-defendants and Applications to Set Aside: the More the Merrier? In the recent case of…

URS v BDW – The winner takes it all…

Introduction On Wednesday 21st of May, the Supreme Court handed down judgment in the long-awaited case of URS Corporation Ltd v BDW Trading Ltd [2025] UKSC 21.  The judgment was awaited by almost all with an interest in construction law and related professional negligence. BDW…

Subscribe to our mailing list

Deka Chambers: 5 Norwich Street, London EC4A 1DR

© Deka Chambers 2025

Search

Portfolio Builder

Select the expertise that you would like to download or add to the portfolio

Download    Add to portfolio   
Portfolio
Title Type CV Email

Remove All

Download


Click here to share this shortlist.
(It will expire after 30 days.)