Medical Law Briefing: August 2021

Briefings

03/08/2021

This article considers the important clinical negligence decisions over the first half of 2021.

In summary:

i. There have been three important reported cases involving fundamental dishonesty pleadings by NHS trusts. This is rapidly becoming a defining area of medical negligence law and all practitioners should be aware of it.

ii. The Supreme Court has delivered an extremely important judgment defining the limits of claims for pure economic loss arising from medical negligence in Khan v Meadows.

iii. There has been substantial consideration of the test for negligence and the standard of care. The test in Bolam and Bolitho remains undisturbed.

iv. Clarification on the test for causation in medical negligence cases has been provided in Davies v Frimley NHS Trust, an important point perhaps surprisingly not appealed from the High Court.

v. Vicarious liability is becoming an increasingly complex topic, and this has recently been extended to vicarious liability for self-employed dental surgeons in Hughes v Rattan. This is a developing area and requires close attention.

vi. There have been two more cases in the long line of authorities on secondary psychiatric injuries arising from the death or serious injury of a loved one. Essentially, the position remains unchanged from Paul v Wolverhampton NHS Trust and ultimately Alcock, but we have two newer examples.

vii. There have been timely reminders on points related to expert evidence, success fees, and rights of action against insurers.

Read the Briefing in full here – Briefing Medical Law – August 2021

Latest News & Events

Adam Dawson awarded MBE in King’s Birthday Honours List 2025

Chambers congratulates Adam Dawson upon being awarded an MBE for services to charity and service to the Jewish Community. For over 30 years Adam has been involved in the heart of the Jewish community, leading several charities and organisations. After a year as Chair of…

The Dekagram: 9th June 2025

This week Russell Wilcox and Thomas Clarke examine whether in applications to set aside default judgment there exists such a thing as a ‘co-defendant principle’; essential reading for all practitioners. Co-defendants and Applications to Set Aside: the More the Merrier? In the recent case of…

URS v BDW – The winner takes it all…

Introduction On Wednesday 21st of May, the Supreme Court handed down judgment in the long-awaited case of URS Corporation Ltd v BDW Trading Ltd [2025] UKSC 21.  The judgment was awaited by almost all with an interest in construction law and related professional negligence. BDW…

Subscribe to our mailing list

Deka Chambers: 5 Norwich Street, London EC4A 1DR

© Deka Chambers 2025

Search

Portfolio Builder

Select the expertise that you would like to download or add to the portfolio

Download    Add to portfolio   
Portfolio
Title Type CV Email

Remove All

Download


Click here to share this shortlist.
(It will expire after 30 days.)