Personal Injury Briefing – May 2021

Briefings

27/05/2021

S 2(2). of the Occupiers Liability Act 1957 sets out the persuasively simple proposition that an occupier owes a duty to take such care as is reasonable to see that its visitors are reasonably safe when using the premises for the purposes for which they are invited or permitted to be there. So far so familiar to a tort lawyer with the concept of reasonableness at its heart. Liability under the Act is however extremely complex and lack of familiarity with it and the cases that have interpreted it exposes lawyers to all sorts of pitfalls.

In this briefing the 1 Chancery Lane Personal Injury team consider some of the most common areas that pose difficulty. Henk Soede discusses what is meant by an occupier, who is a visitor and what happens when the claimant is present on the premises due to some sort of right. Robert Parkin looks at the extensions and restrictions to the duty of care contained in the other subsections of s. 2, including cases involving children and independent contractors, the relevance of warning signs and what happens when a visitor apparently willingly accepts a risk.

Henk and Robert are providing further training in this area in the 1 Chancery Lane Webinar series. On Thursday 10th June at 1pm they will be giving training on Occupiers Liability – Reminder of the Basics. You can register for the webinar here or for further information about the education and training offered by members of 1 Chancery Lane please visit our website or contact Emma Williams, Marketing Manager on ewilliams@dekachambers.com.

Read the Personal Injury Briefing in full here.

Latest News & Events

Adam Dawson awarded MBE in King’s Birthday Honours List 2025

Chambers congratulates Adam Dawson upon being awarded an MBE for services to charity and service to the Jewish Community. For over 30 years Adam has been involved in the heart of the Jewish community, leading several charities and organisations. After a year as Chair of…

The Dekagram: 9th June 2025

This week Russell Wilcox and Thomas Clarke examine whether in applications to set aside default judgment there exists such a thing as a ‘co-defendant principle’; essential reading for all practitioners. Co-defendants and Applications to Set Aside: the More the Merrier? In the recent case of…

URS v BDW – The winner takes it all…

Introduction On Wednesday 21st of May, the Supreme Court handed down judgment in the long-awaited case of URS Corporation Ltd v BDW Trading Ltd [2025] UKSC 21.  The judgment was awaited by almost all with an interest in construction law and related professional negligence. BDW…

Subscribe to our mailing list

Deka Chambers: 5 Norwich Street, London EC4A 1DR

© Deka Chambers 2025

Search

Portfolio Builder

Select the expertise that you would like to download or add to the portfolio

Download    Add to portfolio   
Portfolio
Title Type CV Email

Remove All

Download


Click here to share this shortlist.
(It will expire after 30 days.)