22/04/2021
The Court of Appeal have finally determined the question of whether a represented Defendant must also be personally present at his section 51 sending to the Crown Court in order for proceedings in the Crown Court to be lawful.
Tom Little QC appeared for the prosecution in the Court of Appeal having not appeared below. The Court of Appeal having considered the origins of all of the relevant statutory provisions accepted Tom Little QC’s submission that the wording of section 51 of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 which states “appears or is brought before” does not require personal presence by virtue of the deeming provision in section 122 of the Magistrates’ Courts Act 1981. In doing so he persuaded the Court of Appeal to depart from the CPS’s own guidance and to decide that previous decisions of the Court of Appeal and the Divisional Court were decided per incuriam.
A copy of the judgment can be found here.
This week we bring you a further example of the dangers associated with the use of artificial intelligence in litigation, without the tempering effect of any checks or balances. As more and more of these example come to light, we can expect the courts to…
In the Northamptonshire case, the Court of Appeal allowed the Chief Constable’s appeal, holding that the police had not owed a duty of care to warn the claimant that they had received a report that her former partner, who had threatened her with violence, was…
Join us at The View in the Royal College of Surgeons on Thursday, 6th March for our half day conference focusing on Vulnerable Parties. This conference will provide a legal update on the current position of vulnerable parties/witnesses and participation directions in civil and family…
Deka Chambers: 5 Norwich Street, London EC4A 1DR