Court of Appeal accepts Tom Little QC’s submissions on whether a Defendant must be at their s51 sending hearing

News

22/04/2021

The Court of Appeal have finally determined the question of whether a represented Defendant must also be personally present at his section 51 sending to the Crown Court in order for proceedings in the Crown Court to be lawful.

Tom Little QC appeared for the prosecution in the Court of Appeal having not appeared below. The Court of Appeal having considered the origins of all of the relevant statutory provisions accepted Tom Little QC’s submission that the wording of section 51 of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 which states “appears or is brought before” does not require personal presence by virtue of the deeming provision in section 122 of the Magistrates’ Courts Act 1981. In doing so he persuaded the Court of Appeal to depart from the CPS’s own guidance and to decide that previous decisions of the Court of Appeal and the Divisional Court were decided per incuriam.

A copy of the judgment can be found here.

Featured Counsel

Tom Little KC

Call 1997 | Silk 2018

Head of Chambers

Latest News & Events

Deka Chambers is delighted to announce that Eleanor Mawrey has been awarded the rank of King’s Counsel

It is with great pleasure that Deka Chambers announces that Eleanor Mawrey has been appointed as King’s Counsel in the Ministry of Justice’s new Silk appointments published today, 23rd of January 2026.   Eleanor Mawrey is an experienced barrister practising in serious crime and is ranked in the Financial…

Thom Dyke prosecutes dangerous rapist sentenced to 30 years’ imprisonment

Thom Dyke was instructed by the CPS to prosecute a man accused of a nine-year campaign of rape and sexual abuse against his young daughter.  He was convicted after standing trial at the Crown Court at Croydon last September.   Passing a sentence of thirty years’ imprisonment,…

Success for Andrew Warnock KC, Jack Harding and Gurion Taussig in the Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has ruled that claims for compensation by a man who killed three people, but was acquitted by a jury in the Crown Court on the grounds of insanity, are barred by the doctrine of illegality. The Claimant, Mr Lewis-Ranwell, sought damages from…

© Deka Chambers 2026

Search

Portfolio Builder

Select the expertise that you would like to download or add to the portfolio

Download    Add to portfolio   
Portfolio
Title Type CV Email

Remove All

Download


Click here to share this shortlist.
(It will expire after 30 days.)