22/04/2021
The Court of Appeal have finally determined the question of whether a represented Defendant must also be personally present at his section 51 sending to the Crown Court in order for proceedings in the Crown Court to be lawful.
Tom Little QC appeared for the prosecution in the Court of Appeal having not appeared below. The Court of Appeal having considered the origins of all of the relevant statutory provisions accepted Tom Little QC’s submission that the wording of section 51 of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 which states “appears or is brought before” does not require personal presence by virtue of the deeming provision in section 122 of the Magistrates’ Courts Act 1981. In doing so he persuaded the Court of Appeal to depart from the CPS’s own guidance and to decide that previous decisions of the Court of Appeal and the Divisional Court were decided per incuriam.
A copy of the judgment can be found here.
On 10 April 2025, the Court of Appeal handed down Judgment in Re M (A Child) [2025] EWCA Civ 440, providing long awaited guidance for deciding whether and when to grant intermediary assistance to vulnerable parties in family proceedings. An intermediary is someone whose function…
This week the government announced a further consultation on proposed amendments to the Package Travel and Linked Travel Arrangements Regulations 2018; Anirudh Mandagere considers the proposals in detail and provides a link for the use of those who wish to respond to them. Alternatively, you…
The High Court handed down its judgment in Butler v Ward [2025] EWHC 877 (KB) yesterday, striking out £2.5million of the Claimant’s Schedule of Loss. Francesca O’Neill represented the Defendant surgeon (instructed by DWF LLP). The Judgment also raises interesting questions about when summary judgment applications…
Deka Chambers: 5 Norwich Street, London EC4A 1DR