This briefing considers two recent cases that will be of interest to injury practitioners. The first, Head v Culver Heating Limited is an interesting decision in which the Court of Appeal considers the difference between loss of earnings generated by work and loss of income from investments in the context of a lost years claim.
The second decision Pallett v MGN Limited arises out of the phone hacking scandal, which continues to be the gift that keeps on giving from a litigator’s perspective. The court had to consider whether a defendant who had purported to accept the claimant’s part 36 offer one day after its expiry on the basis that it could avoid the usual costs consequences of acceptance was able to do so.
Read in full here
This week John Schmitt considers JBX v Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust [2026] EWHC 2294 (KB), a recent High Court decision on a ‘lost years’ claim brought by a child, whilst Bethany Hutchison takes a look at a case on ADR and indemnity costs. Quantifying…
We are delighted to share that Julia Brechtelsbauer has been appointed as a Junior Litigators’ Group Coordinator for the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers (APIL). In this role, Julia will help facilitate and chair group meetings, encourage engagement among members, contribute ideas and content for…
By Susanna Bennett The High Court decision of Burgess v Sikorski is novel because the court addressed for the first time whether professional deputyship fees were recoverable in a Fatal Accidents Act case in which two dependants were protected beneficiaries. The answer of Mr Justice…
Deka Chambers: 5 Norwich Street, London EC4A 1DR