This briefing considers two recent cases that will be of interest to injury practitioners. The first, Head v Culver Heating Limited is an interesting decision in which the Court of Appeal considers the difference between loss of earnings generated by work and loss of income from investments in the context of a lost years claim.
The second decision Pallett v MGN Limited arises out of the phone hacking scandal, which continues to be the gift that keeps on giving from a litigator’s perspective. The court had to consider whether a defendant who had purported to accept the claimant’s part 36 offer one day after its expiry on the basis that it could avoid the usual costs consequences of acceptance was able to do so.
Read in full here
Prevention of Future Death reports (“PFDs”) are an increasingly utilised tool in inquests, by which a coroner can draw attention to matters for which action could be taken to prevent future deaths. In 2023, the number of PFDs issued by coroners increased to 550 reports,…
This week we bring you a further example of the dangers associated with the use of artificial intelligence in litigation, without the tempering effect of any checks or balances. As more and more of these example come to light, we can expect the courts to…
In the Northamptonshire case, the Court of Appeal allowed the Chief Constable’s appeal, holding that the police had not owed a duty of care to warn the claimant that they had received a report that her former partner, who had threatened her with violence, was…
Deka Chambers: 5 Norwich Street, London EC4A 1DR