The “Illegality” Defence and the Supreme Court

Articles

06/11/2020

1 Chancery Lane has long had a reputation for appellate advocacy at the highest level.

Last week Andrew Warnock Q.C. and Maurice Rifat were successful in the Supreme Court in the case of Stoffel & Co v Grondona [2020] UKSC 42 which concerned the impact of the illegality defence to a claim against a solicitor for professional  negligence in the context of a mortgage fraud.

The application of the illegality defence was also considered this year by the Supreme Court in Whittington Hospital NHS Trust v XX [2020] UKSC 14 in which Lord Edward Faulks Q.C. appeared for the appellant.

The issue of the “illegality” defence occurs in all Chamber’s practice areas and to mark Andrew’s and Maurice’s success in Stoffel we are offering our clients this bumper bulletin on this sometimes tricky issue.

 

  • Andrew Spencer explains how the Supreme Court dealt with illegality as a defence to a professional negligence claim in Stoffel and looks for clues as to when the illegality defence might succeed in a professional negligence case.  Read Andrew Spencer’s article here.

 

 

 

The Supreme Court website has case summaries with links to the judgments and press releases about these cases. Click on the links below for more details about these cases:

Whittington Hospital NHS Trust v XX [2020] UKSC 14

Stoffel & Co v Grondona [2020] UKSC 42

Henderson v Dorset Healthcare University NHS Foundation Trust [2020] UKSC 43

 

Latest News & Events

Case summary: John v Jane [2026] EWHC 415 (Fam)

Much of children law involves the exploration of the facts relating to the child’s care and welfare, often coloured by the complex relationship dynamics between the adult protagonists. Occasionally, however, the facts which need to be established can be more fundamental.  In John v Jane…

Special Guardianship at the End of Care Proceedings: Threshold Still Matters

By Laura Hibberd Re E (A Child) (Special Guardianship Order: Public Law Proceedings) [2026] EWCA Civ 1167 Special guardianship orders are often thought of as the “middle ground” of permanence: more secure than a care order, less final than adoption, and with the child’s legal…

Case Summary: Re C (Child Arrangements Orders; Domestic Abuse; Child Focused Court) [2026] EWCA Civ 1216

By Tim Parker KC The President of the Family Division handed down judgment on 29th September 2026 the decision in the first appeal following the introduction of Child-Focused Courts pilot. In Re C (Child Arrangements Orders; Domestic Abuse; Child Focused Court) [2026] EWCA Civ 1216…

© Deka Chambers 2026

Search

Portfolio Builder

Select the expertise that you would like to download or add to the portfolio

Download    Add to portfolio   
Portfolio
Title Type CV Email

Remove All

Download


Click here to share this shortlist.
(It will expire after 30 days.)