Thom Dyke secures not guilty verdict in submachine gun case

News

29/06/2020

In November 2017, armed police searched an address in Enfield where they found a Skorpion submachine gun together with a large quantity of ammunition.  Forensic examination of the submachine gun produced a DNA profile which did not match anyone on the National DNA database.

In June 2019 BG was arrested by police for an unrelated matter, and when his DNA sample was taken it matched the profile taken from the submachine gun.  BG was charged with possession of the submachine gun on the basis of the DNA evidence alone.  He pleaded not guilty and was due to stand trial at Snaresbrook Crown Court in July 2020.

Thom drafted detailed written submissions regarding the sufficiency of the DNA evidence and formally requested that the prosecution’s forensic expert carry out a further examination of the case.  As a result of Thom’s submissions, the Crown Prosecution Service took the decision to drop the case against BG and a not guilty verdict was formally returned at a hearing held over Skype on 30 June 2020.

This case underlines the importance for defendants charged with serious offences to always make a robust challenge to any prosecution expert evidence.  Thom is regularly instructed in all manner of serious criminal cases, including those involving firearms. Click here for more information as to his criminal law practice.

Featured Counsel

Thom Dyke

Call 2007

Latest News & Events

We are delighted to welcome Nick Beechey and Nasreen Shah to Deka Chambers

They join us from Great James Street Chambers.   Nick is an experienced leading junior, noted for his particular ability to cut through complex issues of fact and law in order to get to the heart of the case. Nick’s practice is in defending clients…

The Dekagram: 13th July 2026

This week Anirudh Mandagere has written a longer briefing on the use by lawyers of artificial intelligence and how to avoid being accused of negligence (it’s not as straightforward as you may think); the link to his briefing is here. Meanwhile Sarah Prager KC draws…

You could be liable for not using AI. Read this article to find out why

The UK Jurisdiction Taskforce have produced a Legal Statement on Liability for AI Harms. Given that very few cases have reached the courts, the Legal Statement provides much-needed guidance to legal advisors and representatives. In this article Anirudh Mandagere sets out the key aspects of…

© Deka Chambers 2026

Search

Portfolio Builder

Select the expertise that you would like to download or add to the portfolio

Download    Add to portfolio   
Portfolio
Title Type CV Email

Remove All

Download


Click here to share this shortlist.
(It will expire after 30 days.)