Thom Dyke secures not guilty verdict in submachine gun case



In November 2017, armed police searched an address in Enfield where they found a Skorpion submachine gun together with a large quantity of ammunition.  Forensic examination of the submachine gun produced a DNA profile which did not match anyone on the National DNA database.

In June 2019 BG was arrested by police for an unrelated matter, and when his DNA sample was taken it matched the profile taken from the submachine gun.  BG was charged with possession of the submachine gun on the basis of the DNA evidence alone.  He pleaded not guilty and was due to stand trial at Snaresbrook Crown Court in July 2020.

Thom drafted detailed written submissions regarding the sufficiency of the DNA evidence and formally requested that the prosecution’s forensic expert carry out a further examination of the case.  As a result of Thom’s submissions, the Crown Prosecution Service took the decision to drop the case against BG and a not guilty verdict was formally returned at a hearing held over Skype on 30 June 2020.

This case underlines the importance for defendants charged with serious offences to always make a robust challenge to any prosecution expert evidence.  Thom is regularly instructed in all manner of serious criminal cases, including those involving firearms. Click here for more information as to his criminal law practice.

Featured Counsel

Thom Dyke

Call 2007

Latest News & Events

The Dekagram: 20th May 2024

We trust that our readers have been enjoying the Spring sunshine; the team have spent their time in the sun wisely, reading cases so you don’t have to. First we noted a decision which considers the interplay between English and Scottish guardianship; secondly we read…

The Dekagram: 13th May 2024

Last week brought the news that the Australian airline Qantas and the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission have agreed to resolve their dispute over cancelled flights by asking the court to impose a $100 million fine, together with an undertaking by the airline to pay…

Max Melsa appears in Court of Appeal in Re D (Children: Interim Care Order: Hair Strand Testing) [2024] EWCA Civ 498

Max Melsa represented the children, through their Children’s Guardian, in the first case to reach the Court of Appeal specifically dealing with the interpretation of Hair-Strand Tests in care proceedings. The appeal was made by the mother against the interim separation of three children from…

Subscribe to our mailing list

Deka Chambers: 5 Norwich Street, London EC4A 1DR

© Deka Chambers 2024


Portfolio Builder

Select the expertise that you would like to download or add to the portfolio

Download    Add to portfolio   
Title Type CV Email

Remove All


Click here to share this shortlist.
(It will expire after 30 days.)