Thom Dyke secures not guilty verdict in submachine gun case

News

29/06/2020

In November 2017, armed police searched an address in Enfield where they found a Skorpion submachine gun together with a large quantity of ammunition.  Forensic examination of the submachine gun produced a DNA profile which did not match anyone on the National DNA database.

In June 2019 BG was arrested by police for an unrelated matter, and when his DNA sample was taken it matched the profile taken from the submachine gun.  BG was charged with possession of the submachine gun on the basis of the DNA evidence alone.  He pleaded not guilty and was due to stand trial at Snaresbrook Crown Court in July 2020.

Thom drafted detailed written submissions regarding the sufficiency of the DNA evidence and formally requested that the prosecution’s forensic expert carry out a further examination of the case.  As a result of Thom’s submissions, the Crown Prosecution Service took the decision to drop the case against BG and a not guilty verdict was formally returned at a hearing held over Skype on 30 June 2020.

This case underlines the importance for defendants charged with serious offences to always make a robust challenge to any prosecution expert evidence.  Thom is regularly instructed in all manner of serious criminal cases, including those involving firearms. Click here for more information as to his criminal law practice.

Featured Counsel

Thom Dyke

Call 2007

Latest News & Events

The Dekagram: 17th February 2025

This week we examine an unusual arbitration case involving (or did it?) a foreign limitation period; and another decision on the tension between open justice and protection of commercially sensitive information (we understand, by the way, that on 25th February the Court of Appeal will…

The Dekagram: 10th February 2025

This week we look at two decisions, both of which will be of critical importance to practitioners in pursuance of contested litigation. In one, unusually, without prejudice correspondence was admissible in a case involving fundamental dishonesty; whilst in the other, the court reviewed the authorities…

Andrew Warnock KC and Edwin Buckett successfully defend the Chief Constable of Leicestershire in a £10m brain damage claim

Following a 5-day liability trial in the High Court in Manchester, the Claimant’s negligence and Human Rights Act claims were dismissed by HHJ Bird sitting as a Judge of the High Court. The Claimant was a Type 1 diabetic who suffered from a history of…

Subscribe to our mailing list

Deka Chambers: 5 Norwich Street, London EC4A 1DR

© Deka Chambers 2025

Search

Portfolio Builder

Select the expertise that you would like to download or add to the portfolio

Download    Add to portfolio   
Portfolio
Title Type CV Email

Remove All

Download


Click here to share this shortlist.
(It will expire after 30 days.)