16/06/2020
Tom Little QC appeared in a judicial review hearing in the Divisional Court before Rafferty LJ and Sir Michael Supperstone (DAT v The Crown Court & Leeds & The Lord Chancellor, the DPP and The Lord Chief Justice).
The claim was based on three grounds. First that the Lord Chief Justice’s decision in March 2020 that no new jury trials should start was unlawful (b) that the decision to stop jury trials was not a good and sufficient cause to extend the Claimant’s custody time limit and (c) a Protocol issued by the President of the Queen’s Bench Division, the DPP and HMCTS fettered the discretion of the Crown Court Judge when considering the Claimant’s CTL extension. All three grounds for judicial review were rejected by the Court at the hearing. Reasons were given by the Court but a full judgment will be handed down subsequently. Tom Little QC represented the DPP at the judicial review hearing.
Anirudh Mandagere is representing the Secretary of State for the Home Department as an interested party in judicial review proceedings. This judicial review concerns whether Article 8 ECHR or the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child imposes obligations on public authorities to…
The 18th edition of the Judicial College Guidelines for the Assessment of General Damages in Personal Injury Cases will be published on 9th April. Stuart McKechnie KC of Deka Chambers is a co-editor of the Guidelines. The Guidelines for the Assessment of General Damages is designed…
This week brought the news we’ve all been waiting for – yes, the proposed amendments to the Package Travel and Linked Travel Arrangements Regulations 2018 have finally been published! The Package Travel and Linked Travel Arrangements (Amendment) Regulations 2026 As well as being every bit…
Deka Chambers: 5 Norwich Street, London EC4A 1DR