16/06/2020
Tom Little QC appeared in a judicial review hearing in the Divisional Court before Rafferty LJ and Sir Michael Supperstone (DAT v The Crown Court & Leeds & The Lord Chancellor, the DPP and The Lord Chief Justice).
The claim was based on three grounds. First that the Lord Chief Justice’s decision in March 2020 that no new jury trials should start was unlawful (b) that the decision to stop jury trials was not a good and sufficient cause to extend the Claimant’s custody time limit and (c) a Protocol issued by the President of the Queen’s Bench Division, the DPP and HMCTS fettered the discretion of the Crown Court Judge when considering the Claimant’s CTL extension. All three grounds for judicial review were rejected by the Court at the hearing. Reasons were given by the Court but a full judgment will be handed down subsequently. Tom Little QC represented the DPP at the judicial review hearing.
This week’s Dekagram covers the court system from top to bottom, domestically and internationally. Sarah Prager KC examines two recent decisions of the Court of Justice of the European Union relating to air travel, a decision considering the enforcement jurisdiction of the County Court, and…
In this week’s dekagram Dominique Smith examines the all-important topic of Part 36 offers, and the knotty question of whether and how they can be withdrawn, whilst Russell Wilcox considers what currency costs orders should be made in. When can a Part 36 Offer be…
In this week’s Dekagram Kerry Nicholson considers whether there’s any way around a failure to serve an N510 form on time when issuing a claim, and Robbie Parkin examines a quite extraordinary case which looks set to rumble on through the courts for years to…
Deka Chambers: 5 Norwich Street, London EC4A 1DR