16/06/2020
Tom Little QC appeared in a judicial review hearing in the Divisional Court before Rafferty LJ and Sir Michael Supperstone (DAT v The Crown Court & Leeds & The Lord Chancellor, the DPP and The Lord Chief Justice).
The claim was based on three grounds. First that the Lord Chief Justice’s decision in March 2020 that no new jury trials should start was unlawful (b) that the decision to stop jury trials was not a good and sufficient cause to extend the Claimant’s custody time limit and (c) a Protocol issued by the President of the Queen’s Bench Division, the DPP and HMCTS fettered the discretion of the Crown Court Judge when considering the Claimant’s CTL extension. All three grounds for judicial review were rejected by the Court at the hearing. Reasons were given by the Court but a full judgment will be handed down subsequently. Tom Little QC represented the DPP at the judicial review hearing.
In the Northamptonshire case, the Court of Appeal allowed the Chief Constable’s appeal, holding that the police had not owed a duty of care to warn the claimant that they had received a report that her former partner, who had threatened her with violence, was…
Join us at The View in the Royal College of Surgeons on Thursday, 6th March for our half day conference focusing on Vulnerable Parties. This conference will provide a legal update on the current position of vulnerable parties/witnesses and participation directions in civil and family…
As we hit the ground running in 2025, the team looks back at some of the key developments of the Building Safety Act (“BSA”) in 2024 and opine on where we may be headed in the future. Building Liability Orders Wilmott Dixon Construction Ltd v…
Deka Chambers: 5 Norwich Street, London EC4A 1DR