- Alternative Dispute Resolution
- Civil Fraud
- Clinical Negligence & Healthcare
- Commercial, Chancery & Property
- Court of Protection
- Credit Hire
- Crime
- Family Law
- Financial Crime
- Inquests & Inquiries
- Personal Injury
- Police Law
- Professional Negligence
- Public Sector & Human Rights
- Regulatory & Disciplinary
- Travel & Cross Border Claims
- If Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562 was argued today, would Ms Donoghue have had QOCS protection? Not if she had been claiming for the cost of another bottle of ginger beer, as well as damages for gastro-enteritis, according to an “undoubtedly memorable” submission made to the Court of Appeal in Andrea Brown v (1) Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis (2) The Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police (The Equality and Human Rights Commission Intervening) [2019] EWCA Civ 1724.
- Brown is the first time that the Court of Appeal has grappled with the application of the QOCS regime to “mixed” claims, (i.e. where a claimant claims damages for personal injury and in the same proceedings also claims non-personal injury damages or other relief). Lord Faulks QC of 1 Chancery Lane was Leading Counsel for the successful respondent.
- In my article I examine the Court of Appeal’s conclusion that a mixed claim does not benefit from automatic QOCS protection, and argue that the guidance it has given as to when a court should disapply QOCS in mixed cases is wrong.
- The short answer to the question about Ms Donoghue, incidentally, is that she could not have claimed the cost of another bottle of ginger beer. She did not buy the first one. If she had, she could have sued in contract rather than tort. Her case would have never reached the House of Lords, and she would have been unknown to generations of lawyers.
Latest News & Events
The Dekagram: 10th November 2025
This week’s Dekagram covers the court system from top to bottom, domestically and internationally. Sarah Prager KC examines two recent decisions of the Court of Justice of the European Union relating to air travel, a decision considering the enforcement jurisdiction of the County Court, and…
The Dekagram: 3rd November 2025
In this week’s dekagram Dominique Smith examines the all-important topic of Part 36 offers, and the knotty question of whether and how they can be withdrawn, whilst Russell Wilcox considers what currency costs orders should be made in. When can a Part 36 Offer be…
The Dekagram: 27th October 2025
In this week’s Dekagram Kerry Nicholson considers whether there’s any way around a failure to serve an N510 form on time when issuing a claim, and Robbie Parkin examines a quite extraordinary case which looks set to rumble on through the courts for years to…
Subscribe to our mailing list
Deka Chambers: 5 Norwich Street, London EC4A 1DR
- T +44 (0)20 7832 0500
- E clerks@dekachambers.com
- DX LDE 439
