- Alternative Dispute Resolution
- Civil Fraud
- Clinical Negligence & Healthcare
- Commercial, Chancery & Property
- Court of Protection
- Credit Hire
- Crime
- Family Law
- Financial Crime
- Inquests & Inquiries
- Personal Injury
- Police Law
- Professional Negligence
- Public Sector & Human Rights
- Regulatory & Disciplinary
- Travel & Cross Border Claims
- If Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562 was argued today, would Ms Donoghue have had QOCS protection? Not if she had been claiming for the cost of another bottle of ginger beer, as well as damages for gastro-enteritis, according to an “undoubtedly memorable” submission made to the Court of Appeal in Andrea Brown v (1) Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis (2) The Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police (The Equality and Human Rights Commission Intervening) [2019] EWCA Civ 1724.
- Brown is the first time that the Court of Appeal has grappled with the application of the QOCS regime to “mixed” claims, (i.e. where a claimant claims damages for personal injury and in the same proceedings also claims non-personal injury damages or other relief). Lord Faulks QC of 1 Chancery Lane was Leading Counsel for the successful respondent.
- In my article I examine the Court of Appeal’s conclusion that a mixed claim does not benefit from automatic QOCS protection, and argue that the guidance it has given as to when a court should disapply QOCS in mixed cases is wrong.
- The short answer to the question about Ms Donoghue, incidentally, is that she could not have claimed the cost of another bottle of ginger beer. She did not buy the first one. If she had, she could have sued in contract rather than tort. Her case would have never reached the House of Lords, and she would have been unknown to generations of lawyers.
Latest News & Events
Clarity on Intermediaries in Family Law Proceedings
On 10 April 2025, the Court of Appeal handed down Judgment in Re M (A Child) [2025] EWCA Civ 440, providing long awaited guidance for deciding whether and when to grant intermediary assistance to vulnerable parties in family proceedings. An intermediary is someone whose function…
The Dekagram: 14th April 2025
This week the government announced a further consultation on proposed amendments to the Package Travel and Linked Travel Arrangements Regulations 2018; Anirudh Mandagere considers the proposals in detail and provides a link for the use of those who wish to respond to them. Alternatively, you…
The High Court handed down its judgment in Butler v Ward [2025] EWHC 877 (KB) yesterday, striking out £2.5million of the Claimant’s Schedule of Loss. Francesca O’Neill represented the Defendant surgeon (instructed by DWF LLP). The Judgment also raises interesting questions about when summary judgment applications…
Subscribe to our mailing list
Deka Chambers: 5 Norwich Street, London EC4A 1DR
- T +44 (0)20 7832 0500
- E clerks@dekachambers.com
- DX LDE 439
