Edwin Buckett establishes liability in a claim against the Ministry of Justice

News

30/07/2019

The Claimant was a Prison Officer at HMP Winchester, who responded to an alarm call which concerned two fighting prisoners. The prisoners were separated and the Claimant held one of them on the ground, whilst the other prisoner backed off along the corridor of the Wing. Three other Prison Officers failed to restrain and contain that prisoner, allowing him to force his way back towards the prisoner on the ground (and the Claimant who was attached to him). The unrestrained prisoner then picked up a metal chair and smashed it onto the Claimant causing severe injuries which ended his career as a Prison Officer.

A two day liability only trial proceeded before His Honour Judge Saunders at Central London County Court, concluding on the 30th July, 2019 with the Claimant securing full judgment against the MOJ who were responsible for the other Prison Officers and the prison.

The Judge concluded that the Claimant was in a vulnerable position, on the ground, with a prisoner who was also a “magnet” to the unrestrained prisoner. He held that the remaining Prison Officers should have used full Control and Restraint techniques, as per their training, to prevent the prisoner from re-engaging in the fight.

The MOJ made no offers to settle the claim and were ordered to pay indemnity costs and interest on costs, following offers to settle by the Claimant pre-trial.

Edwin was instructed by Vincent Reynolds of Thompsons (London) on behalf of the Prisoner Officers Association, for the Claimant.

Featured Counsel

Edwin Buckett

Call 1988

Latest News & Events

The Dekagram: 19th January 2026

In this week’s Dekagram Dominique Smith examines a recent decision of the Court of Appeal considering and endorsing 90:10 split liability offers (contrary to the received wisdom following the decision of the High Court in Mundy v TUI [2023] EWHC 385 (Ch); and Robbie Parkin…

Kerry Nicholson writes about Paul v Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust and the implications for secondary victims in cross border cases for the Journal of Personal Injury Law

Kerry analyses Paul v Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust and the Supreme Court’s attempt to impose coherence on decades of caselaw from McLoughlin, Alcock and Frost through Walters, Shorter and Ronayne. She then asks the hard question for modern travel law practitioners: what, if anything, can claimants do…

Thomas Jones appointed to the Welsh Government’s Panel of Counsel

The Counsel General for Wales and Minister for Delivery has appointed Thomas Jones to the Welsh Government’s B Panel of Counsel. Panel Counsel are appointed to provide specialist advocacy and advisory work for the Welsh Government. Tom’s appointment runs for a period of five years…

© Deka Chambers 2026

Search

Portfolio Builder

Select the expertise that you would like to download or add to the portfolio

Download    Add to portfolio   
Portfolio
Title Type CV Email

Remove All

Download


Click here to share this shortlist.
(It will expire after 30 days.)