‘Dangerous’ offenders in ‘premeditated’ attack sentenced to 25 years



James Thacker and Jennie Oborne successfully prosecuted a “vicious, shameful and premeditated” attack committed with the intention of procuring a miscarriage in June 2019.

Harief Pearson (21), Kydie McKenna (22) and a 16 year old girl each pleaded guilty to attempting to cause grievous bodily harm with intent after a sustained assault against a pregnant teenager who had refused to abort Mr Pearson’s child.

In the month before the attack, Mr Pearson googled “How to get rid of an unborn baby”. He then arranged the assault by the two female defendants, who kicked, punched and choked the teenager saying “we’ll be getting rid of it for you”. Pearson came back into the blood splattered room on one occasion saying: “I don’t think it’s dead yet, continue”. When the teenager asked for water, one of the defendants poured vodka and laundry detergent down her throat.

On Friday 5th July 2019 at Harrow Crown Court, Lady Justice Simler (sitting as a judge of the high court), found Pearson and McKenna ‘dangerous’; that means that they each pose a significant risk to members of the public of serious harm of committing further specified offences. They were sentenced to 11 years’ and 10 years’ imprisonment respectively with an extended period on licence of 2 years. The effect of those sentences is that they will not be automatically released halfway through their sentence but their case will be referred to the Parole Board who will only release if satisfied it is no longer necessary for the protection of the public that the person should be confined. If released they will be supervised pursuant to the extended licence for 2 years in addition to the one third remaining from their custodial sentence. If they are not released two thirds into their sentence, they will serve the full terms of their custodial sentences. The 16 year old defendant was sentenced to 4 years’ detention due to her age and vulnerabilities.

Prior to sentencing, Mr. Pearson applied to vacate his guilty pleas on the bases that he ‘regretted’ entering them and had felt under pressure. After hearing evidence from Mr. Pearson and his original barrister, and listening to legal argument, Lady Justice Simler refused the application concluding ‘He entered his pleas freely and understanding the consequences of doing so. The extent to which he has regretted it afterwards does not make it unjust in making him hold to those guilty pleas’.

News can be found here:

James Thacker and Jennie Oborne were instructed by Luisa Stuart of the Crown Prosecution Service.

Featured Counsel

James Thacker KC

Call 2001 | Silk 2024

Latest News & Events

The Dekagram: 20th May 2024

We trust that our readers have been enjoying the Spring sunshine; the team have spent their time in the sun wisely, reading cases so you don’t have to. First we noted a decision which considers the interplay between English and Scottish guardianship; secondly we read…

The Dekagram: 13th May 2024

Last week brought the news that the Australian airline Qantas and the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission have agreed to resolve their dispute over cancelled flights by asking the court to impose a $100 million fine, together with an undertaking by the airline to pay…

Max Melsa appears in Court of Appeal in Re D (Children: Interim Care Order: Hair Strand Testing) [2024] EWCA Civ 498

Max Melsa represented the children, through their Children’s Guardian, in the first case to reach the Court of Appeal specifically dealing with the interpretation of Hair-Strand Tests in care proceedings. The appeal was made by the mother against the interim separation of three children from…

Subscribe to our mailing list

Deka Chambers: 5 Norwich Street, London EC4A 1DR

© Deka Chambers 2024


Portfolio Builder

Select the expertise that you would like to download or add to the portfolio

Download    Add to portfolio   
Title Type CV Email

Remove All


Click here to share this shortlist.
(It will expire after 30 days.)