Kyah Mufti acted for the Defendant, YR, in a trial where the prosecution alleged that YR had trespassed on his ex-employers’ property and stolen items in order to blackmail his ex-employers for money.
The prosecution relied on CCTV of YR entering the business premises and removing the items, and a recorded phone conversation of YR’s demand for money. The case involved lengthy cross examination of the ex-employers, in particular relating to large sums of unpaid wages to YR and communications between YR and the ex-employers.
The team has returned from holiday, relaxed, refreshed and ready to go; we hope our readers are feeling similarly rejuvenated. In our absence, the courts have been busily handing down judgments left, right and centre. Challenging Jurisdiction In Graham v Fidelidade [2024] EWHC 2010 (KB)…
Join us at Eighteen on Thursday, 14th November for an afternoon of presentations on the topic of rehabilitation. Our expert speakers, along with members of Deka Chambers’ personal injury team, will provide a range of talks focusing on rehabilitation. Three acclaimed experts will be sharing insights…
We are proud to announce that Deka Chambers has been shortlisted as a finalist for Family Law Chambers of the Year – London. The family law team at Deka Chambers offers advice and advocacy in all areas of family practice and regularly appear in the…
Deka Chambers: 5 Norwich Street, London EC4A 1DR