Thom Dyke acted for the defendant, TG, in a complex fraud trial involving alleged losses of nearly half a million pounds. TG was found not guilty by the jury after the three week trial at Guildford Crown Court.
The prosecution alleged that TG had moved in with his elderly mother following the death of his father. He was said to have set out to systematically defraud her of her life savings by obtaining a power of attorney over her financial affairs. Nearly half a million pounds was taken from her savings, with hundreds of thousands of pounds being spent on expensive renovation and building work. Large sums were withdrawn in cash without any account of where they were spent.
The case involved a three-day cross-examination of the central prosecution witness in the case and presentation of complex financial evidence to the jury. TG was acquitted of all charges. Thom was instructed by Harrington Myers Solicitors.
Chambers congratulates Adam Dawson upon being awarded an MBE for services to charity and service to the Jewish Community. For over 30 years Adam has been involved in the heart of the Jewish community, leading several charities and organisations. After a year as Chair of…
This week Russell Wilcox and Thomas Clarke examine whether in applications to set aside default judgment there exists such a thing as a ‘co-defendant principle’; essential reading for all practitioners. Co-defendants and Applications to Set Aside: the More the Merrier? In the recent case of…
Introduction On Wednesday 21st of May, the Supreme Court handed down judgment in the long-awaited case of URS Corporation Ltd v BDW Trading Ltd [2025] UKSC 21. The judgment was awaited by almost all with an interest in construction law and related professional negligence. BDW…
Deka Chambers: 5 Norwich Street, London EC4A 1DR