Giles Mooney settles cauda equina claim for £2.25 million

News

12/08/2018

Giles Mooney has successfully settled the case of Smith v Tesco at a Joint Settlement Meeting. The case which has been running for over four years concerned a Claimant who was injured at work whilst driving a shunter vehicle. He drove the vehicle over a sunken hydrant cover causing his seat to bottom out. The jarring to his back caused a disc to prolapse leading to cauda equina syndrome.

A preliminary trial on liability in 2016 before David Pittaway QC sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge, concluded in the Claimant’s favour after Giles was able to fatally undermine the Defendant’s medical expert in the course of cross examination.

The case then proceeded to quantum with expert evidence dealing with the Claimant’s complex medical, care, housing and transport needs obtained by both sides. The Claimant had been rendered disabled and he was reliant on a walking stick and mobility scooter to mobilise and had substantial care needs. He had not returned to work and had little prospect of doing so.

The Claimant contended for the full difference in value between his current home and the required premises on the basis that both the life time rental and the 25 year interest only mortgage for the short fall exceeded the difference in value between the premises. Whilst various arguments were rehearsed in the Schedule and Counter Schedule the case was eventually settled on a global basis. The Defendant, represented by Ben Browne QC and William Wraight, offered £2.25 million which was accepted by the Claimant.

Featured Counsel

Giles Mooney KC

Call 1998 | Silk 2019

Latest News & Events

The Dekagram: 17th February 2025

This week we examine an unusual arbitration case involving (or did it?) a foreign limitation period; and another decision on the tension between open justice and protection of commercially sensitive information (we understand, by the way, that on 25th February the Court of Appeal will…

The Dekagram: 10th February 2025

This week we look at two decisions, both of which will be of critical importance to practitioners in pursuance of contested litigation. In one, unusually, without prejudice correspondence was admissible in a case involving fundamental dishonesty; whilst in the other, the court reviewed the authorities…

Andrew Warnock KC and Edwin Buckett successfully defend the Chief Constable of Leicestershire in a £10m brain damage claim

Following a 5-day liability trial in the High Court in Manchester, the Claimant’s negligence and Human Rights Act claims were dismissed by HHJ Bird sitting as a Judge of the High Court. The Claimant was a Type 1 diabetic who suffered from a history of…

Subscribe to our mailing list

Deka Chambers: 5 Norwich Street, London EC4A 1DR

© Deka Chambers 2025

Search

Portfolio Builder

Select the expertise that you would like to download or add to the portfolio

Download    Add to portfolio   
Portfolio
Title Type CV Email

Remove All

Download


Click here to share this shortlist.
(It will expire after 30 days.)