Giles Mooney settles cauda equina claim for £2.25 million

News

12/08/2018

Giles Mooney has successfully settled the case of Smith v Tesco at a Joint Settlement Meeting. The case which has been running for over four years concerned a Claimant who was injured at work whilst driving a shunter vehicle. He drove the vehicle over a sunken hydrant cover causing his seat to bottom out. The jarring to his back caused a disc to prolapse leading to cauda equina syndrome.

A preliminary trial on liability in 2016 before David Pittaway QC sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge, concluded in the Claimant’s favour after Giles was able to fatally undermine the Defendant’s medical expert in the course of cross examination.

The case then proceeded to quantum with expert evidence dealing with the Claimant’s complex medical, care, housing and transport needs obtained by both sides. The Claimant had been rendered disabled and he was reliant on a walking stick and mobility scooter to mobilise and had substantial care needs. He had not returned to work and had little prospect of doing so.

The Claimant contended for the full difference in value between his current home and the required premises on the basis that both the life time rental and the 25 year interest only mortgage for the short fall exceeded the difference in value between the premises. Whilst various arguments were rehearsed in the Schedule and Counter Schedule the case was eventually settled on a global basis. The Defendant, represented by Ben Browne QC and William Wraight, offered £2.25 million which was accepted by the Claimant.

Featured Counsel

Giles Mooney KC

Call 1998 | Silk 2019

Latest News & Events

Adam Dawson awarded MBE in King’s Birthday Honours List 2025

Chambers congratulates Adam Dawson upon being awarded an MBE for services to charity and service to the Jewish Community. For over 30 years Adam has been involved in the heart of the Jewish community, leading several charities and organisations. After a year as Chair of…

The Dekagram: 9th June 2025

This week Russell Wilcox and Thomas Clarke examine whether in applications to set aside default judgment there exists such a thing as a ‘co-defendant principle’; essential reading for all practitioners. Co-defendants and Applications to Set Aside: the More the Merrier? In the recent case of…

URS v BDW – The winner takes it all…

Introduction On Wednesday 21st of May, the Supreme Court handed down judgment in the long-awaited case of URS Corporation Ltd v BDW Trading Ltd [2025] UKSC 21.  The judgment was awaited by almost all with an interest in construction law and related professional negligence. BDW…

Subscribe to our mailing list

Deka Chambers: 5 Norwich Street, London EC4A 1DR

© Deka Chambers 2025

Search

Portfolio Builder

Select the expertise that you would like to download or add to the portfolio

Download    Add to portfolio   
Portfolio
Title Type CV Email

Remove All

Download


Click here to share this shortlist.
(It will expire after 30 days.)