Jamie McCracken succeeds in establishing subconscious racial bias in recruitment process

News

11/07/2018

The Employment Tribunal has today published its decision in the matter of Miss S Cole v Derbyshire County Council.

Jamie McCracken represented Miss Cole, who describes herself as ‘Black British’, at the final hearing of this case over several days having not been involved at earlier stages. The case was a complex series of allegations which asserted an unconscious racial bias in the recruitment process.

As can be seen from the judgment, Jamie recast the complex allegations at the commencement of the hearing in order to clarify the claims being made and the evidential basis upon which the claim was advanced. As is expected in such a case there were no allegations of overt racially motivated treatment at least at the outset and in the recruitment process, although there were some alleged later in the process which were not upheld.

In reality this was a case where the Claimant was suggesting that the reasons she had not been promoted were related to her race but she had no direct evidence of racially motivated treatment. Accordingly the case was advanced on the basis of inferences to be drawn from the facts as viewed following skilful cross examination of the Respondent’s witnesses.

Accordingly, the panel did not make a unanimous decision but the majority accepted that the inferences to be drawn were those advanced by Jamie on behalf of Miss Cole, namely that she was not promoted because of her racial background.

You can read the Employment Tribunal decision here.

Featured Counsel

Jamie McCracken

Call 1998

Latest News & Events

We are delighted to welcome Nick Beechey and Nasreen Shah to Deka Chambers

They join us from Great James Street Chambers.   Nick is an experienced leading junior, noted for his particular ability to cut through complex issues of fact and law in order to get to the heart of the case. Nick’s practice is in defending clients…

The Dekagram: 13th July 2026

This week Anirudh Mandagere has written a longer briefing on the use by lawyers of artificial intelligence and how to avoid being accused of negligence (it’s not as straightforward as you may think); the link to his briefing is here. Meanwhile Sarah Prager KC draws…

You could be liable for not using AI. Read this article to find out why

The UK Jurisdiction Taskforce have produced a Legal Statement on Liability for AI Harms. Given that very few cases have reached the courts, the Legal Statement provides much-needed guidance to legal advisors and representatives. In this article Anirudh Mandagere sets out the key aspects of…

© Deka Chambers 2026

Search

Portfolio Builder

Select the expertise that you would like to download or add to the portfolio

Download    Add to portfolio   
Portfolio
Title Type CV Email

Remove All

Download


Click here to share this shortlist.
(It will expire after 30 days.)