Jamie McCracken succeeds in establishing subconscious racial bias in recruitment process

News

11/07/2018

The Employment Tribunal has today published its decision in the matter of Miss S Cole v Derbyshire County Council.

Jamie McCracken represented Miss Cole, who describes herself as ‘Black British’, at the final hearing of this case over several days having not been involved at earlier stages. The case was a complex series of allegations which asserted an unconscious racial bias in the recruitment process.

As can be seen from the judgment, Jamie recast the complex allegations at the commencement of the hearing in order to clarify the claims being made and the evidential basis upon which the claim was advanced. As is expected in such a case there were no allegations of overt racially motivated treatment at least at the outset and in the recruitment process, although there were some alleged later in the process which were not upheld.

In reality this was a case where the Claimant was suggesting that the reasons she had not been promoted were related to her race but she had no direct evidence of racially motivated treatment. Accordingly the case was advanced on the basis of inferences to be drawn from the facts as viewed following skilful cross examination of the Respondent’s witnesses.

Accordingly, the panel did not make a unanimous decision but the majority accepted that the inferences to be drawn were those advanced by Jamie on behalf of Miss Cole, namely that she was not promoted because of her racial background.

You can read the Employment Tribunal decision here.

Featured Counsel

Jamie McCracken

Call 1998

Latest News & Events

Case summary: John v Jane [2026] EWHC 415 (Fam)

Much of children law involves the exploration of the facts relating to the child’s care and welfare, often coloured by the complex relationship dynamics between the adult protagonists. Occasionally, however, the facts which need to be established can be more fundamental.  In John v Jane…

Special Guardianship at the End of Care Proceedings: Threshold Still Matters

By Laura Hibberd Re E (A Child) (Special Guardianship Order: Public Law Proceedings) [2026] EWCA Civ 1167 Special guardianship orders are often thought of as the “middle ground” of permanence: more secure than a care order, less final than adoption, and with the child’s legal…

Case Summary: Re C (Child Arrangements Orders; Domestic Abuse; Child Focused Court) [2026] EWCA Civ 1216

By Tim Parker KC The President of the Family Division handed down judgment on 29th September 2026 the decision in the first appeal following the introduction of Child-Focused Courts pilot. In Re C (Child Arrangements Orders; Domestic Abuse; Child Focused Court) [2026] EWCA Civ 1216…

© Deka Chambers 2026

Search

Portfolio Builder

Select the expertise that you would like to download or add to the portfolio

Download    Add to portfolio   
Portfolio
Title Type CV Email

Remove All

Download


Click here to share this shortlist.
(It will expire after 30 days.)