03/07/2018
Tom Little QC appeared in Belhaj and Boudchar v DPP and FCO in the Supreme Court which considered whether a decision not to prosecute is “in a criminal cause or matter” for the purposes of the Justice and Security Act 2013. The Supreme Court decided by a majority of 3:2 that public law claims challenging a decision not to prosecute are a criminal matter and therefore there is no vires to hold Closed Material Proceedings. The decision will have significant ramifications in judicial review proceedings of decisions not to prosecute which involve issues of national security.
This week we examine an unusual arbitration case involving (or did it?) a foreign limitation period; and another decision on the tension between open justice and protection of commercially sensitive information (we understand, by the way, that on 25th February the Court of Appeal will…
This week we look at two decisions, both of which will be of critical importance to practitioners in pursuance of contested litigation. In one, unusually, without prejudice correspondence was admissible in a case involving fundamental dishonesty; whilst in the other, the court reviewed the authorities…
Following a 5-day liability trial in the High Court in Manchester, the Claimant’s negligence and Human Rights Act claims were dismissed by HHJ Bird sitting as a Judge of the High Court. The Claimant was a Type 1 diabetic who suffered from a history of…
Deka Chambers: 5 Norwich Street, London EC4A 1DR