Giles Mooney wins High Court Clinical Negligence Claim



On 18th April 2018 Mr Justice Jay gave Judgment for the Claimant after the trial of Meynell v Croydon Health Service NHS Trust. Giles Mooney, representing the Claimant argued that the Trust had been negligent in failing to diagnose and treat the Claimant for acute appendicitis when he attended hospital. Instead the Defendant discharged the Claimant from hospital and told him to return the next day for diagnostic tests. Overnight the Claimant’s appendix perforated leading to peritonitis. It was agreed medical evidence that had an appendicectomy occurred on the day of his presentation at hospital the Claimant would have avoided peritonitis and the ensuing complications (open rather than keyhole surgery, infection and long term IBS).

On behalf of the Defendant it was argued that the Claimant presented with unusual symptoms for appendicitis and it was reasonable for the Defendant to doubt that the Claimant was suffering from appendicitis and hence referral to the “hot clinic” the following day was a reasonable response.

Despite the unusual presentation, the treating doctors and the Defendant’s expert conceded, under cross examination by Giles, that there was no other realistic diagnosis other than appendicitis in this case. This concession led to Mr Justice Jay finding in favour of the Claimant. The award for damages included a sum for loss of chance where the Claimant, an aircraft engineer, had missed an exam to qualify him to work on different types of airplane as a result of his injury.

Giles was instructed by Elizabeth O’Mahony at BL Claims.

Featured Counsel

Giles Mooney KC

Call 1998 | Silk 2019

Latest News & Events

The Dekagram: 13th May 2024

Last week brought the news that the Australian airline Qantas and the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission have agreed to resolve their dispute over cancelled flights by asking the court to impose a $100 million fine, together with an undertaking by the airline to pay…

Max Melsa appears in Court of Appeal in Re D (Children: Interim Care Order: Hair Strand Testing) [2024] EWCA Civ 498

Max Melsa represented the children, through their Children’s Guardian, in the first case to reach the Court of Appeal specifically dealing with the interpretation of Hair-Strand Tests in care proceedings. The appeal was made by the mother against the interim separation of three children from…

Dekinar: Understanding the New Fixed Costs Regime for Cross-Border Claims

In this webinar, Thomas Yarrow and Anirudh Mandagere will take a look at the new fixed costs regime with a specific eye on its impacts on litigation with a cross-border element. Thomas and Anirudh will also answer any questions you may have on the issues…

Subscribe to our mailing list

Deka Chambers: 5 Norwich Street, London EC4A 1DR

© Deka Chambers 2024


Portfolio Builder

Select the expertise that you would like to download or add to the portfolio

Download    Add to portfolio   
Title Type CV Email

Remove All


Click here to share this shortlist.
(It will expire after 30 days.)