28/03/2018
Yesterday, James Byrne representing the Serious Fraud Office, won a landmark decision in the Court of Appeal establishing new guidance on how courts should approach tainted gifts during confiscation proceedings in the LIBOR prosecution of Tom Hayes.
Tom Hayes was found guilty of manipulating LIBOR and sentenced to 11 years in prison. At first instance he was subject to a confiscation order in the sum of c.£800,000. He sought to appeal half the order on the basis that it was not a tainted gift to his wife because she had provided sufficient value as a home maker. The Court of Appeal found against Hayes in respect of all his arguments and went further by adopting the SFO’s submissions on how the court should approach such an argument, and the valuation of tainted gifts in the future. The judgment provides much needed clarity and will be the precedent judgment relied when arguing about the value of tainted gifts.
Max Melsa and Madeleine Miller appeared in the case of Re: F, G and H (Return Home Under Supervision Order) [2026] EWCA Civ 713, involving the making of Supervision Orders and the return of three children to the mother’s care following a rolled up Final Hearing where…
We haven’t brought our readers news from North of the border for some time – this week Imogen Todd examines a Scottish case on the disapplication of qualified one way costs shifting on account of unreasonable conduct, whilst Sarah Prager KC draws attention to a…
We would like to thank our clients and everyone else who supported our seven nominations across three practice areas in the Legal 500 Awards 2026. We extend our warmest congratulations to all the finalists and in particular our six members. The nominations are: Clinical Negligence Gurion…
Deka Chambers: 5 Norwich Street, London EC4A 1DR