In London Borough of Brent v NB [2017] EWCOP 34 Senior Judge Hilder published her judgment considering whether it was in the best interests of P, a 22 year old with dyskinetic tetraplegic cerebral palsy, to undertake a 12-week period of intensive support and assessment at a rehabilitation centre. P’s capacity to make that decision was in issue but he had expressed a wish not to attend. The judgment contains a detailed review of how the Court considers best interests of P fits within an intractable dispute between care givers and family member.
Ed Lamb was instructed by P’s father. Judgment can be read here.
Meeting your partner online used to be cause for embarrassment and spy-worthy cover stories about “how we met”. Nowadays, it is entirely unremarkable. Similarly, there used to be shame and secrecy attached to use of assisted reproduction methods such as In Vitro Fertilisation (IVF). Again,…
This article is written by Max Melsa as part of the August 2026 edition of the Family Law Dekagram (newsletter). I had the privilege of being involved in Re D (Children: Interim Care Order: Hair Strand Testing) [2024] EWCA Civ 498 in which the Court…
In July 2026’s edition of 𝐏𝐈 𝐅𝐨𝐜𝐮𝐬 𝐦𝐚𝐠𝐚𝐳𝐢𝐧e, 𝐒𝐭𝐮𝐚𝐫𝐭 𝐌𝐜𝐊𝐞𝐜𝐡𝐧𝐢𝐞 𝐊𝐂 wrote the second in a series of articles about important issues in Spinal Cord Injury claims along with his friend Daniel Taylor, who is a practicing Barrister living with a high-level SCI. In this…
Deka Chambers: 5 Norwich Street, London EC4A 1DR