Court of Appeal Reserve Judgment on CICA Discount Rate

News

10/12/2017

The Court of Appeal has finished hearing arguments as to whether the CICA was right to apply the Lord Chancellor’s Prescribed Discount Rate in assessing future care costs in a pre-tariff case under the 1990 Scheme. The rate had been used even though the CICA is not subject to the Damages Act 1996, under which the rate is set.

The CICA tribunal applied the then 2.5% Discount Rate prescribed by the Lord Chancellor under the Damages Act 1996, even though the Damages Act does not apply to the CICA. The award was to a brain damaged young man who needs the award to provide life- long care. The agreed evidence of the former government actuary before the tribunal in 2012 was that in order to provide for full compensation the CICA needed to apply Discount Rates of 0% for RPI related losses and minus 1.5% for earnings related losses. This meant that the award that the CICA made was £5.6 million instead of the £16 million that was needed to provide full compensation under the scheme. The effect of the award is that it will run out by the time the now 28 year old claimant is 48, only halfway through his remaining expected life, and he and those caring for him will not be able to afford any care for the rest of his life.
In April 2015 Mr Justice Jay upheld the decision of the CICA on judicial review. After hearing arguments on 5th December 2017 Lord Justice Patten and Lord Justice Sales reserved their judgment. It is anticipated that it will be handed down soon.
 
Grahame Aldous QC and Laura Begley of 9 Gough Chambers are acting for the Claimant.

Featured Counsel

Grahame Aldous KC

Call 1979 | Silk 2008

Latest News & Events

James Thacker KC and Giles Bedloe reach successful conclusion to Operation Avalion securing 34 year sentence

Following his conviction in February for the kidnap, two counts of rape and torture of a vulnerable young woman, Gagandeep Singh has been sentenced to 28 years’ imprisonment with an additional extended licence of 6 years. He has been recommended for deportation to India. James and Giles,…

Maximum Protection in MH v Costa Crociere SpA: Consumers, Cruises and the CJEU

Introduction On 4th June 2026 the Court of Justice of the European Union handed down its judgment in Case C-629/24 MH v Costa Crociere SpA on the interaction between the Athens Regulation (No 392/2009) and the Package Travel Directive. This article provides some observations which…

Re: F, G and H (Return Home Under Supervision Order) [2026] EWCA Civ 713

Max Melsa and Madeleine Miller appeared in the case of Re: F, G and H (Return Home Under Supervision Order) [2026] EWCA Civ 713, involving the making of Supervision Orders and the return of three children to the mother’s care following a rolled up Final Hearing where…

© Deka Chambers 2026

Search

Portfolio Builder

Select the expertise that you would like to download or add to the portfolio

Download    Add to portfolio   
Portfolio
Title Type CV Email

Remove All

Download


Click here to share this shortlist.
(It will expire after 30 days.)