I stand here. I can do nothing else. God help me!

News

29/11/2017

In R(Brooks) v Independent Adjudicator, Secretary of State for Justice Intervening [2016] EWCA Civ 1033, handed down 28.10.16, McCombe LJ, with whom Jackson LJ agreed, found in favour of submissions by Simon P G Murray, counsel for the successful appellant, the Secretary of State. He allowed the appeal on the basis inter alia that, as with Martin Luther before the Diet of Worms in 1521, the Prison Governor could only say ‘Here I stand, I can do no other. God help me! ’ in the face of allegations that he had acted unlawfully in HRA terms in detaining B because the Governor was obliged to detain him by reason of provisions of primary legislation (see paragraphs 14, 18 and 23 of the judgment). This point concerned the hitherto rarely used provisions of section 6(2)(a) of the Human Rights Act 1998 which provide that an act cannot be unlawful in HRA terms if the public authority could “could not have acted differently”. McComb thus accepted “the Luther Point”.

The Court of Appeal also found in favour of the SSJ’s submissions there was here no violation of Article 5(1) of the ECHR, in any event and, obiter, that it would notwithstanding the first two points have probably found that the Governor was a “second actor” and the case was one of the category where a decision quashed in judicial review proceedings was not void ab initio

Latest News & Events

The Dekagram: 20th May 2024

We trust that our readers have been enjoying the Spring sunshine; the team have spent their time in the sun wisely, reading cases so you don’t have to. First we noted a decision which considers the interplay between English and Scottish guardianship; secondly we read…

The Dekagram: 13th May 2024

Last week brought the news that the Australian airline Qantas and the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission have agreed to resolve their dispute over cancelled flights by asking the court to impose a $100 million fine, together with an undertaking by the airline to pay…

Max Melsa appears in Court of Appeal in Re D (Children: Interim Care Order: Hair Strand Testing) [2024] EWCA Civ 498

Max Melsa represented the children, through their Children’s Guardian, in the first case to reach the Court of Appeal specifically dealing with the interpretation of Hair-Strand Tests in care proceedings. The appeal was made by the mother against the interim separation of three children from…

Subscribe to our mailing list

Deka Chambers: 5 Norwich Street, London EC4A 1DR

© Deka Chambers 2024

Search

Portfolio Builder

Select the expertise that you would like to download or add to the portfolio

Download    Add to portfolio   
Portfolio
Title Type CV Email

Remove All

Download


Click here to share this shortlist.
(It will expire after 30 days.)