The death of the “off road vehicle defence” is announced

News

14/11/2017

For decades Insurers and the Motor Insurance Bureau have refused compensation to injured members of the public just because the negligent driver who caused the injuries was driving an off-road vehicle. Now that defence, which was always contrary to principle and undermined the whole raison d’etre of the Road Traffic Act 1988, has been pretty much abolished. Mr Justice Bryan in Lewington v MIB [2017] EWHC 2848, judgment attached here, ruled that the Act must be interpreted in accordance with the EC Directive on road traffic insurance and that the Directive does not permit derogation from the blanket obligation to insure vehicles used on public roads.

For Charli Lewington it has been a long hard fight. The MIB refused her application for compensation under the Untraced Drivers Agreement 2003. On appeal by way of arbitration Richard Methuen QC rejected her application on paper and then again after a full hearing. Finally 5 years and 8 months after the accident in which Ms Lewington suffered spinal fractures, the High Court has delivered justice.

Andrew Ritchie QC was instructed by Slater and Gordon, Manchester.

Latest News & Events

The Dekagram: 14th September 2026

This week John Schmitt considers JBX v Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust [2026] EWHC 2294 (KB), a recent High Court decision on a ‘lost years’ claim brought by a child, whilst Bethany Hutchison takes a look at a case on ADR and indemnity costs. Quantifying…

Congratulations to Julia Brechtelsbauer on her appointment as APIL Junior Litigators’ Group Coordinator

We are delighted to share that Julia Brechtelsbauer has been appointed as a Junior Litigators’ Group Coordinator for the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers (APIL). In this role, Julia will help facilitate and chair group meetings, encourage engagement among members, contribute ideas and content for…

Burgess v Sikorski: deputyship fees in Fatal Accidents Act claims

By Susanna Bennett The High Court decision of Burgess v Sikorski is novel because the court addressed for the first time whether professional deputyship fees were recoverable in a Fatal Accidents Act case in which two dependants were protected beneficiaries. The answer of Mr Justice…

© Deka Chambers 2026

Search

Portfolio Builder

Select the expertise that you would like to download or add to the portfolio

Download    Add to portfolio   
Portfolio
Title Type CV Email

Remove All

Download


Click here to share this shortlist.
(It will expire after 30 days.)