Part 36 offers, 99% offered, Indemnity Costs and Enhanced Interest on Costs awarded, Genuine Offer



The Claimant was knocked off his motor cycle in Commercial Road, East London on the 2nd September 2015 by the Defendant who was driving a car straight across a traffic light controlled junction against a red light. A bus was turning in the junction and obscured the Defendants view as he passed through the junction.   The Defendant asserted that the Claimant was travelling too fast through the junction and contributed to the accident through his won negligence.  HHJ Robinson, sitting as a deputy High Court judge dealing with liability and causation Held: that there was no contributory negligence on the Claimant’s part and judgment was entered for 100%.  On costs the Claimant produced a part 36 offer made before trial in which he offered to settle liability at 99% giving away 1%.  The Defendant rejected the offer.  On the Claimant’s application under CPR36.17 the Judge ordered the Defendant to pay indemnity costs from 21 days after the part 36 offer was made and ordered the Defendant to pay interest on costs of 7.5% pa on those costs.  Considering the leading case of Huck v Robson [2002] EWCA civ 398 and the provisions of CPR 36.17(5), the Judge ruled that the 99% part 36 offer was a genuine attempt to settle the case because the quantum of the case was between £1 million and £3 million and so 1% represented a £10,000 – £30,000 saving had the Defendant accepted the offer.  In addition the Judge considered the stress of putting the Claimant through trial would have been avoided had the offer been accepted.

Andrew Ritchie QC appeared for the Claimant and it was instructed by Fletchers Solicitors, Southport.

Latest News & Events

Consultation Paper Seeks Reform of Limitation Law in Child Sexual Abuse Cases

The Ministry of Justice has released a consultation paper seeking views on potential reforms to the law of limitation in child sexual abuse cases in England and Wales. Under the current law, child sexual abuse cases in civil courts are subject to the same three-year…

The Dekagram: 20th May 2024

We trust that our readers have been enjoying the Spring sunshine; the team have spent their time in the sun wisely, reading cases so you don’t have to. First we noted a decision which considers the interplay between English and Scottish guardianship; secondly we read…

The Dekagram: 13th May 2024

Last week brought the news that the Australian airline Qantas and the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission have agreed to resolve their dispute over cancelled flights by asking the court to impose a $100 million fine, together with an undertaking by the airline to pay…

Subscribe to our mailing list

Deka Chambers: 5 Norwich Street, London EC4A 1DR

© Deka Chambers 2024


Portfolio Builder

Select the expertise that you would like to download or add to the portfolio

Download    Add to portfolio   
Title Type CV Email

Remove All


Click here to share this shortlist.
(It will expire after 30 days.)