Stuart McKechnie, instructed by Stewarts Law and led by Frank Burton QC, has today achieved High Court approval on a record breaking claim with a capitalised equivalent value of £28 million.
The infant claimant, who was 3 ½ years old at the time of the RTA and 8 years old at settlement, sustained catastrophic brain injury resulting in profound disability, 24/7 care, extensive therapeutic input and a need for specialist accommodation. Stuart was instructed as junior counsel on the case from the very outset and worked closely with Perry Redgrave from Stewarts Law over a period of 4 years leading up to a settlement meeting on 14th January 2017. At that meeting, which was Frank Burton QC’s very last commitment at the Bar before retirement, the parties agreed a settlement based on a variable PPO covering future care and case management needs and a lump sum of £4.9 million. At the same time, in view of the impending announcement of the outcome of the discount rate review, the parties agreed a formula for recalculating the future recurring losses element of lump sum damages in the event that the discount rate was reduced.
As a result of the reduction in the discount rate to -0.75%, the parties agreed a revised lump sum figure of £9,113,074. When combined with the agreed PPO for care and case management across the Claimant’s life expectancy, the settlement has a combined capitalised equivalent of £28 million. The settlement was approved at a hearing before Mr. Justice Foskett on 17th March 2017, at which Stuart represented the Claimant. It is believed to be the highest personal injury award ever approved by a Court.
Click here for the press coverage.
We will be attending the Advanced Brain and Spinal Cord Injury Conference by APIL. The following barristers will be at the conference: ➡️ Laura Johnson K ➡️ Edward Lamb KC ➡️ Stephen Glynn ➡️ Laura Begley ➡️ Christopher Stephenson ➡️ Jeremy Ford ➡️ Rob Horner ➡️ Linda Nelson ➡️ Sabrina Hartshorn ➡️ Christopher Lowe From our…
Imogen Todd looks at the recent decision in X and Y (Children: Adoption Order: Setting Aside) [2026] UKSC 13, in which the UK Supreme Court ruled that courts have no inherent jurisdiction to revoke a valid adoption order outside the limited statutory exceptions or the appeal process. The…
This week we focus on how, and where, to resolve disputes; and remind our readers (again) of the dangers of failing to comply with service requirements. Meanwhile, we note that the claim in the Dyson litigation has now settled without admission of liability; watch this…
Deka Chambers: 5 Norwich Street, London EC4A 1DR