Christopher Stephenson successfully represented a woman who had to learn to walk again after mouth infection spread to her brain



Christopher Stephenson successfully represented a woman in the High Court last week in her claim against her former dentist for his failure to treat her over a period of 20 years. Holroyde J found that Dr Patel’s significant breaches of duty over a prolonged period of time caused her to develop gum disease which went untreated despite regular attendances upon him. The Claimant eventually developed an odontic abscess that seeded infection in her brain, causing a brain abscess which nearly killed her. Fortunately she made a good recovery from her neurological injuries, but lost 6 teeth that she would otherwise have kept.

The Judge accepted the Claimant’s case that but for the breaches of duty she would on the balance of probability have given up smoking and maintained good oral hygiene such that the disease would have stabilised. Further, the Judge accepted the alternative submission that the Dr Patel’s breaches of duty materially contributed to her injuries and that chronic adult periodontitis is an indivisible disease, although he decided the causation issue on the simple ‘but for’ test in the Claimant’s favour. The Claimant beat her own Part 36 Offer, with consequential costs awards made in her favour.

Read the news here.

Featured Counsel

Latest News & Events

The Dekagram: 20th May 2024

We trust that our readers have been enjoying the Spring sunshine; the team have spent their time in the sun wisely, reading cases so you don’t have to. First we noted a decision which considers the interplay between English and Scottish guardianship; secondly we read…

The Dekagram: 13th May 2024

Last week brought the news that the Australian airline Qantas and the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission have agreed to resolve their dispute over cancelled flights by asking the court to impose a $100 million fine, together with an undertaking by the airline to pay…

Max Melsa appears in Court of Appeal in Re D (Children: Interim Care Order: Hair Strand Testing) [2024] EWCA Civ 498

Max Melsa represented the children, through their Children’s Guardian, in the first case to reach the Court of Appeal specifically dealing with the interpretation of Hair-Strand Tests in care proceedings. The appeal was made by the mother against the interim separation of three children from…

Subscribe to our mailing list

Deka Chambers: 5 Norwich Street, London EC4A 1DR

© Deka Chambers 2024


Portfolio Builder

Select the expertise that you would like to download or add to the portfolio

Download    Add to portfolio   
Title Type CV Email

Remove All


Click here to share this shortlist.
(It will expire after 30 days.)