Christopher Stephenson successfully represented a woman who had to learn to walk again after mouth infection spread to her brain

News

30/01/2017

Christopher Stephenson successfully represented a woman in the High Court last week in her claim against her former dentist for his failure to treat her over a period of 20 years. Holroyde J found that Dr Patel’s significant breaches of duty over a prolonged period of time caused her to develop gum disease which went untreated despite regular attendances upon him. The Claimant eventually developed an odontic abscess that seeded infection in her brain, causing a brain abscess which nearly killed her. Fortunately she made a good recovery from her neurological injuries, but lost 6 teeth that she would otherwise have kept.

The Judge accepted the Claimant’s case that but for the breaches of duty she would on the balance of probability have given up smoking and maintained good oral hygiene such that the disease would have stabilised. Further, the Judge accepted the alternative submission that the Dr Patel’s breaches of duty materially contributed to her injuries and that chronic adult periodontitis is an indivisible disease, although he decided the causation issue on the simple ‘but for’ test in the Claimant’s favour. The Claimant beat her own Part 36 Offer, with consequential costs awards made in her favour.

Read the news here.

Featured Counsel

Latest News & Events

Deka Chambers attends APIL’s Advanced Brain and Spinal Cord Injury Conference

We will be attending the Advanced Brain and Spinal Cord Injury Conference by APIL.  The following barristers will be at the conference: ➡️ Laura Johnson K ➡️ Edward Lamb KC ➡️ Stephen Glynn ➡️ Laura Begley  ➡️ Christopher Stephenson ➡️ Jeremy Ford ➡️ Rob Horner  ➡️ Linda Nelson  ➡️ Sabrina Hartshorn ➡️ Christopher Lowe From our…

X and Y (Children: Adoption Order: Setting Aside) [2026] UKSC 13

Imogen Todd looks at the recent decision in X and Y (Children: Adoption Order: Setting Aside) [2026] UKSC 13, in which the UK Supreme Court ruled that courts have no inherent jurisdiction to revoke a valid adoption order outside the limited statutory exceptions or the appeal process. The…

The Dekagram: 11th May 2026

This week we focus on how, and where, to resolve disputes; and remind our readers (again) of the dangers of failing to comply with service requirements. Meanwhile, we note that the claim in the Dyson litigation has now settled without admission of liability; watch this…

© Deka Chambers 2026

Search

Portfolio Builder

Select the expertise that you would like to download or add to the portfolio

Download    Add to portfolio   
Portfolio
Title Type CV Email

Remove All

Download


Click here to share this shortlist.
(It will expire after 30 days.)