Court of Appeal upholds liability of holiday companies for hotel food to be of ‘satisfactory quality’



The court has considered the liability of holiday company First Choice for sickness suffered by two holidaymakers in the Dominican Republic as a result of food and drink at the hotel, which was the only place they ate and drank while on holiday. A county court judge had decided that the hotel had taken all reasonable precautions to ensure that the food and drink were safe, but that nevertheless the couple had been ill from what they ate or drank. The trial judge had held that the holiday company who had offered the all-inclusive holiday were liable for the food and drink being of ‘satisfactory quality’ whether there was fault or not. He did so on the basis that a term to that effect was implied into the contract by S4 of the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982.

First Choice appealed and the Court of Appeal have upheld the decision of the judge below that the implied term in S4 did apply. Liability had therefore been made out under the statutory term and an alternative argument that a term would be applied at common law did not have to be considered. The court pointed out, however, that this did not amount to strict liability for all holiday bugs, and claimants would have to prove that the hotel food they consumed was below a satisfactory quality and that that had caused their illness.

Grahame Aldous QC of 9 Gough Chambers was taken in to conduct the appeal in the Court of Appeal.

Find the judgment here.

Featured Counsel

Grahame Aldous KC

Call 1979 | Silk 2008

Latest News & Events

The Dekagram: 20th May 2024

We trust that our readers have been enjoying the Spring sunshine; the team have spent their time in the sun wisely, reading cases so you don’t have to. First we noted a decision which considers the interplay between English and Scottish guardianship; secondly we read…

The Dekagram: 13th May 2024

Last week brought the news that the Australian airline Qantas and the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission have agreed to resolve their dispute over cancelled flights by asking the court to impose a $100 million fine, together with an undertaking by the airline to pay…

Max Melsa appears in Court of Appeal in Re D (Children: Interim Care Order: Hair Strand Testing) [2024] EWCA Civ 498

Max Melsa represented the children, through their Children’s Guardian, in the first case to reach the Court of Appeal specifically dealing with the interpretation of Hair-Strand Tests in care proceedings. The appeal was made by the mother against the interim separation of three children from…

Subscribe to our mailing list

Deka Chambers: 5 Norwich Street, London EC4A 1DR

© Deka Chambers 2024


Portfolio Builder

Select the expertise that you would like to download or add to the portfolio

Download    Add to portfolio   
Title Type CV Email

Remove All


Click here to share this shortlist.
(It will expire after 30 days.)