The Supreme Court today handed down judgment in the eagerly awaited case of R v Golds, in which a 7 judge constitution of the Supreme Court considered the meaning of the word ‘substantial’ in the context of the partial defence to murder of diminished responsibility. The Supreme Court unanimously accepted the Prosecution’s analysis of the previous case law on the meaning of the word substantial. Tom Little, who was led by David Perry QC, appeared for the Prosecution in Golds.
The judgment is available here.
Meeting your partner online used to be cause for embarrassment and spy-worthy cover stories about “how we met”. Nowadays, it is entirely unremarkable. Similarly, there used to be shame and secrecy attached to use of assisted reproduction methods such as In Vitro Fertilisation (IVF). Again,…
This article is written by Max Melsa as part of the August 2026 edition of the Family Law Dekagram (newsletter). I had the privilege of being involved in Re D (Children: Interim Care Order: Hair Strand Testing) [2024] EWCA Civ 498 in which the Court…
In July 2026’s edition of 𝐏𝐈 𝐅𝐨𝐜𝐮𝐬 𝐦𝐚𝐠𝐚𝐳𝐢𝐧e, 𝐒𝐭𝐮𝐚𝐫𝐭 𝐌𝐜𝐊𝐞𝐜𝐡𝐧𝐢𝐞 𝐊𝐂 wrote the second in a series of articles about important issues in Spinal Cord Injury claims along with his friend Daniel Taylor, who is a practicing Barrister living with a high-level SCI. In this…
Deka Chambers: 5 Norwich Street, London EC4A 1DR