Esther Maclachlan successfully appeals a final care order, acting for the mother in the Court of Appeal



Esther Maclachlan successfully appeals a final care order, acting for the mother in the Court of Appeal. Tara Vindis, also at 9 Gough Chambers, was instructed on behalf of the Guardian for the Court of Appeal hearing.

This is the second successful appeal in these protracted and unusual care proceedings which commenced in 2014.

Following the initial final hearing before a District Judge the court ordered the child was to be placed for adoption. At this stage Esther was instructed and following a successful appeal, heard by HHJ Purkiss, the matter was the remitted for a fresh hearing.

In November after a contested hearing the Recorder ordered the child should be rehabilitated to the mother. The rehabilitation plan did not progress as had been envisaged by the court and the mother argued she had not been properly supported by the Local Authority. Nevertheless the child was returned and settled in her care.

In March following a further contested hearing the Recorder ordered that the child should be removed from her care and relied on four incidents which had occurred since December to explain the change of tide. Despite the Local Authority arguing for adoption the care plan set out a plan for long term foster care. The Recorder ordered the child should be placed in long term foster care with contact six times a year.

In the Court of Appeal, Lady Justice Black, Mr Justice Tomlinson and Mr Justice Lindblom accepted all the submissions made on the mother’s behalf by Esther Maclachlan that the Recorder had failed to give proper weight to the circumstances surrounding the incidents which had led to his change of heart. He had failed to put these into context. Furthermore he had been led into error by the unclear and confusing care plan which was inchoate.

The matter has been transferred to the High Court and a rehearing has been listed.

Click here for the judgement.

Latest News & Events

The Dekagram: 20th May 2024

We trust that our readers have been enjoying the Spring sunshine; the team have spent their time in the sun wisely, reading cases so you don’t have to. First we noted a decision which considers the interplay between English and Scottish guardianship; secondly we read…

The Dekagram: 13th May 2024

Last week brought the news that the Australian airline Qantas and the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission have agreed to resolve their dispute over cancelled flights by asking the court to impose a $100 million fine, together with an undertaking by the airline to pay…

Max Melsa appears in Court of Appeal in Re D (Children: Interim Care Order: Hair Strand Testing) [2024] EWCA Civ 498

Max Melsa represented the children, through their Children’s Guardian, in the first case to reach the Court of Appeal specifically dealing with the interpretation of Hair-Strand Tests in care proceedings. The appeal was made by the mother against the interim separation of three children from…

Subscribe to our mailing list

Deka Chambers: 5 Norwich Street, London EC4A 1DR

© Deka Chambers 2024


Portfolio Builder

Select the expertise that you would like to download or add to the portfolio

Download    Add to portfolio   
Title Type CV Email

Remove All


Click here to share this shortlist.
(It will expire after 30 days.)