Tom Goodhead secures £150,000 settlement of Clinical Negligence claim



Tom Goodhead has achieved approval of a settlement of £150,000 in damages on behalf of the family of ‘O’ who died in 2011 at the age of 43. ‘O’ died following mismanagement of a subarachnoid haemorrhage leading to death. Liability was admitted by the King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust but quantum remained in dispute.

Following admission of liability, Tom was instructed to represent the family at mediation. The mediation itself was an unusual feature of the case and lasted for 10 hours. Despite some progress towards settlement being achieved at mediation, Tom was unable to advise the family to accept the settlement sum offered by the NHSLA.

Tom advised further investigations be undertaken as to the financial and services dependency claims. A forensic accountant’s report was obtained and served on the NHSLA.

Tom and his instructing solicitors relied upon the first instance judgment in the case of Knauer v MOJ [2014] EWHC 2553 to support the levels of dependency claimed.

Settlement of £150,000 was achieved by way of acceptance of a Part 36 Offer just prior to the service of proceedings.

The settlement represented a 600% increase on the sum offered in settlement of the case prior to Tom’s involvement.

Tom was instructed by Jodie Miller of Slater and Gordon LLP, Manchester.

Latest News & Events

The Dekagram: 20th May 2024

We trust that our readers have been enjoying the Spring sunshine; the team have spent their time in the sun wisely, reading cases so you don’t have to. First we noted a decision which considers the interplay between English and Scottish guardianship; secondly we read…

The Dekagram: 13th May 2024

Last week brought the news that the Australian airline Qantas and the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission have agreed to resolve their dispute over cancelled flights by asking the court to impose a $100 million fine, together with an undertaking by the airline to pay…

Max Melsa appears in Court of Appeal in Re D (Children: Interim Care Order: Hair Strand Testing) [2024] EWCA Civ 498

Max Melsa represented the children, through their Children’s Guardian, in the first case to reach the Court of Appeal specifically dealing with the interpretation of Hair-Strand Tests in care proceedings. The appeal was made by the mother against the interim separation of three children from…

Subscribe to our mailing list

Deka Chambers: 5 Norwich Street, London EC4A 1DR

© Deka Chambers 2024


Portfolio Builder

Select the expertise that you would like to download or add to the portfolio

Download    Add to portfolio   
Title Type CV Email

Remove All


Click here to share this shortlist.
(It will expire after 30 days.)