Stress in the City: The employer’s exposure



A work-related stress claim (Anthony Finn v KBC Bank NV) brought by an international banker working in Fund Derivatives for KBC Bank NV settled outside Court 15 in the High Court of Justice, Queen’s Bench Division, before the trial was due to commence before Mr. Justice Mitting.

The claimant alleged that he sustained injuries (Meniere’s disease and depression) due to stress. It was alleged that the stress was caused by an excessive workload, undertaking additional administrative operational work, undertaking work when he had no experience of dealing with such matters.

The claimant asserted that the bank was in breach of its common law duty of care (see Sutherland v Hatton; Somerset County Council v Barber; Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council v Jones; Baker Refractories Ltd v Bishop [2002] EWCA Civ 76, [2002] 2 ALL ER 1) and regulation 3 of the Management and Safety at work Regulations 1999 (see Kennedy v Cordia (Services) LLP [2016] UKSC 6, [2016] 1 WLR 597).

The parties compromised the claim for damages and costs, which was approved by Mitting J.

The Health and Safety Executive estimates that at least 18,000 workers in UK financial services and insurance business suffered from work related stress, depression or anxiety caused by their job in the last 12 months.

Claims relating to stress are some of the most expensive claims that the financial services sector faces. In the City, these are routinely multi-million pound claims and can be in the tens of millions.

9 Gough Chambers has specialist practitioners available to assist solicitors with these complex claims.

Simon Butler was instructed on behalf of J Garrard & Allen LLP.

Featured Counsel

Simon Butler

Call 1996

Latest News & Events

The Dekagram: 20th May 2024

We trust that our readers have been enjoying the Spring sunshine; the team have spent their time in the sun wisely, reading cases so you don’t have to. First we noted a decision which considers the interplay between English and Scottish guardianship; secondly we read…

The Dekagram: 13th May 2024

Last week brought the news that the Australian airline Qantas and the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission have agreed to resolve their dispute over cancelled flights by asking the court to impose a $100 million fine, together with an undertaking by the airline to pay…

Max Melsa appears in Court of Appeal in Re D (Children: Interim Care Order: Hair Strand Testing) [2024] EWCA Civ 498

Max Melsa represented the children, through their Children’s Guardian, in the first case to reach the Court of Appeal specifically dealing with the interpretation of Hair-Strand Tests in care proceedings. The appeal was made by the mother against the interim separation of three children from…

Subscribe to our mailing list

Deka Chambers: 5 Norwich Street, London EC4A 1DR

© Deka Chambers 2024


Portfolio Builder

Select the expertise that you would like to download or add to the portfolio

Download    Add to portfolio   
Title Type CV Email

Remove All


Click here to share this shortlist.
(It will expire after 30 days.)