Andrew Ritchie QC represents the 17 families affected by the June 2015 Tunisia terrorist attack



At the 3rd pre-inquest review hearing in the High Court today Andrew Ritchie QC, representing the families of 17 of the 30 British citizens who were murdered at Sousse beach, submitted that more information on the security at the Imperial Hotel should be disclosed to HM Coroner by TUI and the Foreign Office.

Ritchie raised the question of whether Her Majesty’s Government should have imposed a duty of candour on TUI to inform holiday makers before taking bookings of the FCO travel advice that there was “a high risk of terrorist attacks” in tourist areas. This was in the knowledge that before the attack TUI failed to make any mention in their holiday brochures (online or paper) of the risk of terrorist attacks in tourist areas in Tunisia.

Ritchie also raised the question of whether the FCO failed to protect tourists after the March 2015 terrorist attack on tourists at the Bardo Museum in Tunis, by failing to “embargo” travel to Sousse until security had been improved.

The 4th pre-inquest hearing will be held on 13th September 2016.

Click here to read more.

Latest News & Events

The Dekagram: 20th May 2024

We trust that our readers have been enjoying the Spring sunshine; the team have spent their time in the sun wisely, reading cases so you don’t have to. First we noted a decision which considers the interplay between English and Scottish guardianship; secondly we read…

The Dekagram: 13th May 2024

Last week brought the news that the Australian airline Qantas and the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission have agreed to resolve their dispute over cancelled flights by asking the court to impose a $100 million fine, together with an undertaking by the airline to pay…

Max Melsa appears in Court of Appeal in Re D (Children: Interim Care Order: Hair Strand Testing) [2024] EWCA Civ 498

Max Melsa represented the children, through their Children’s Guardian, in the first case to reach the Court of Appeal specifically dealing with the interpretation of Hair-Strand Tests in care proceedings. The appeal was made by the mother against the interim separation of three children from…

Subscribe to our mailing list

Deka Chambers: 5 Norwich Street, London EC4A 1DR

© Deka Chambers 2024


Portfolio Builder

Select the expertise that you would like to download or add to the portfolio

Download    Add to portfolio   
Title Type CV Email

Remove All


Click here to share this shortlist.
(It will expire after 30 days.)