Court of Appeal grants permission to appeal CICA Discount Rate

News

09/05/2016

On 10th May 2016 Lord Justice Sales gave permission at an oral hearing in the case of LSX v CICA for a CICA Claimant to appeal against the Discount Rate used by the CICA in assessing future care costs in a pre-tariff case under the 1990 Scheme.

The CICA tribunal applied the 2.5% Discount Rate prescribed by the Lord Chancellor under the Damages Act 1996, even though the Damages Act does not apply to the CICA. The award was to a brain damaged young man who needs the award to provide life- long 24 hour care. The agreed evidence of the former government actuary before the tribunal was that in order to provide for full compensation the CICA needed to apply Discount Rates of 0% for RPI related losses and minus 1.5% for earnings related losses. This meant that the award that the CICA made was £5.6 million instead of the £16 million that was needed to provide full compensation under the scheme. The effect of the award is that it will run out by the time the 27 year old claimant is 48, only halfway through his expected life, and he and those caring for him will not be able to afford any care for the rest of his life.

In April 2015 Mr Justice Jay upheld the decision of the CICA on judicial review.

The argument going to the Court of Appeal is that in applying the Damages Act Discount Rate the CICA was not assessing the award on the basis of the common law as required by the 1990 CICA Scheme, and that the award needs to provide full compensation, not half full compensation.

Grahame Aldous QC and Laura Begley of 9 Gough Chambers are acting for the Claimant.

Grahame Aldous QC was instructed by Stuart Brazington of Withy King Solicitors.

Featured Counsel

Grahame Aldous KC

Call 1979 | Silk 2008

Latest News & Events

Adam Dawson awarded MBE in King’s Birthday Honours List 2025

Chambers congratulates Adam Dawson upon being awarded an MBE for services to charity and service to the Jewish Community. For over 30 years Adam has been involved in the heart of the Jewish community, leading several charities and organisations. After a year as Chair of…

The Dekagram: 9th June 2025

This week Russell Wilcox and Thomas Clarke examine whether in applications to set aside default judgment there exists such a thing as a ‘co-defendant principle’; essential reading for all practitioners. Co-defendants and Applications to Set Aside: the More the Merrier? In the recent case of…

URS v BDW – The winner takes it all…

Introduction On Wednesday 21st of May, the Supreme Court handed down judgment in the long-awaited case of URS Corporation Ltd v BDW Trading Ltd [2025] UKSC 21.  The judgment was awaited by almost all with an interest in construction law and related professional negligence. BDW…

Subscribe to our mailing list

Deka Chambers: 5 Norwich Street, London EC4A 1DR

© Deka Chambers 2025

Search

Portfolio Builder

Select the expertise that you would like to download or add to the portfolio

Download    Add to portfolio   
Portfolio
Title Type CV Email

Remove All

Download


Click here to share this shortlist.
(It will expire after 30 days.)