The HCPC conclude that a Radiographer’s fitness to practice is not impaired

News

29/03/2016

A senior Radiographer employed by North Cumbria University Hospitals NHS Trust was brought before the HCPC concerning allegations of failing to comply with protocols, obtaining authorization to conduct examinations of patients, and failing to perform appropriate scans.

It was accepted by the Radiographer that her actions were not in the best interests of service users, acting outside the boundaries of her professions and that her actions might damage public confidence.

The Radiographer was under immense pressure due to lack of staff and the need to see a high number of patients. On occasions she confirmed that the department would not have had a Consultant Radiologist on duty to obtain authorization to perform certain scans.

The Panel accepted submissions made on behalf of the Radiographer that the allegations would not bring the profession into disrepute nor undermine public confidence.  The Radiographer was at all material times acting in the best interests of the patients.

The Radiographer had fully remediated her practice and that she had shown full insight in to her failings.

It was accepted that the public interest did not demand that any restriction should be placed upon her registration.

In the circumstances, the Panel concluded that the Radiographer’s fitness to practice is not currently impaired by reason of her misconduct.

Simon Butler was instructed by BSG LLP to represent the Radiographer.

Featured Counsel

Simon Butler

Call 1996

Latest News & Events

The Dekagram: 17th February 2025

This week we examine an unusual arbitration case involving (or did it?) a foreign limitation period; and another decision on the tension between open justice and protection of commercially sensitive information (we understand, by the way, that on 25th February the Court of Appeal will…

The Dekagram: 10th February 2025

This week we look at two decisions, both of which will be of critical importance to practitioners in pursuance of contested litigation. In one, unusually, without prejudice correspondence was admissible in a case involving fundamental dishonesty; whilst in the other, the court reviewed the authorities…

Andrew Warnock KC and Edwin Buckett successfully defend the Chief Constable of Leicestershire in a £10m brain damage claim

Following a 5-day liability trial in the High Court in Manchester, the Claimant’s negligence and Human Rights Act claims were dismissed by HHJ Bird sitting as a Judge of the High Court. The Claimant was a Type 1 diabetic who suffered from a history of…

Subscribe to our mailing list

Deka Chambers: 5 Norwich Street, London EC4A 1DR

© Deka Chambers 2025

Search

Portfolio Builder

Select the expertise that you would like to download or add to the portfolio

Download    Add to portfolio   
Portfolio
Title Type CV Email

Remove All

Download


Click here to share this shortlist.
(It will expire after 30 days.)