The HCPC conclude that a Radiographer’s fitness to practice is not impaired

News

29/03/2016

A senior Radiographer employed by North Cumbria University Hospitals NHS Trust was brought before the HCPC concerning allegations of failing to comply with protocols, obtaining authorization to conduct examinations of patients, and failing to perform appropriate scans.

It was accepted by the Radiographer that her actions were not in the best interests of service users, acting outside the boundaries of her professions and that her actions might damage public confidence.

The Radiographer was under immense pressure due to lack of staff and the need to see a high number of patients. On occasions she confirmed that the department would not have had a Consultant Radiologist on duty to obtain authorization to perform certain scans.

The Panel accepted submissions made on behalf of the Radiographer that the allegations would not bring the profession into disrepute nor undermine public confidence.  The Radiographer was at all material times acting in the best interests of the patients.

The Radiographer had fully remediated her practice and that she had shown full insight in to her failings.

It was accepted that the public interest did not demand that any restriction should be placed upon her registration.

In the circumstances, the Panel concluded that the Radiographer’s fitness to practice is not currently impaired by reason of her misconduct.

Simon Butler was instructed by BSG LLP to represent the Radiographer.

Featured Counsel

Simon Butler

Call 1996

Latest News & Events

Success for Andrew Warnock KC, Jack Harding and Gurion Taussig in the Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has ruled that claims for compensation by a man who killed three people, but was acquitted by a jury in the Crown Court on the grounds of insanity, are barred by the doctrine of illegality. The Claimant, Mr Lewis-Ranwell, sought damages from…

The Dekagram: 19th January 2026

In this week’s Dekagram Dominique Smith examines a recent decision of the Court of Appeal considering and endorsing 90:10 split liability offers (contrary to the received wisdom following the decision of the High Court in Mundy v TUI [2023] EWHC 385 (Ch); and Robbie Parkin…

Kerry Nicholson writes about Paul v Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust and the implications for secondary victims in cross border cases for the Journal of Personal Injury Law

Kerry analyses Paul v Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust and the Supreme Court’s attempt to impose coherence on decades of caselaw from McLoughlin, Alcock and Frost through Walters, Shorter and Ronayne. She then asks the hard question for modern travel law practitioners: what, if anything, can claimants do…

© Deka Chambers 2026

Search

Portfolio Builder

Select the expertise that you would like to download or add to the portfolio

Download    Add to portfolio   
Portfolio
Title Type CV Email

Remove All

Download


Click here to share this shortlist.
(It will expire after 30 days.)