Inquest into Tunisia Terrorist Attack delayed until 2017



The full hearing of the inquest into the deaths of 30 British people killed in a terrorist attack in Tunisia in June 2015 will start on 16th January 2017.

Andrew Ritchie QC is representing the families of sixteen of the victims and appeared at the High Court today for a pre-Inquest hearing today.

The families invited the coroner to consider how to prevent future deaths at tourist sites by reporting to authorities, recommending that holiday companies should be highlighting the risk of terrorism to potential holiday makers in a clear way that allowed them to make informed decisions when booking holidays. The families allege that TUI did not pass on Foreign Office advice to customers before the attack that warned of a “high threat from terrorism, including kidnapping. Attacks could be indiscriminate including places visited by foreigners.” Ritchie also highlighted that some customers were sold travel insurance by Thompson Holidays which did not cover cancellations related to the risk of a terror attack and customers who had booked were discouraged by Thompsons from cancelling potentially dangerous trips because their money would not be refunded.

Andrew Ritchie QC said: “They [the families] are very concerned that TUI (Thomson’s parent company) and the travel industry in England and Wales are still involved in a general practice which puts customers at risk by hiding or ignoring Foreign Office warnings in their brochures and booking forms.”

The inquest will look at what, if anything, the UK government and travel companies knew about the risk of an attack at the Mediterranean resort and the coroner will also consider security at the hotel and the “adequacy” of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office’s travel advice for the region.

Andrew Ritchie QC is instructed by Irwin Mitchell LLP.

For wider coverage of this case see:

Latest News & Events

The Dekagram: 13th May 2024

Last week brought the news that the Australian airline Qantas and the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission have agreed to resolve their dispute over cancelled flights by asking the court to impose a $100 million fine, together with an undertaking by the airline to pay…

Max Melsa appears in Court of Appeal in Re D (Children: Interim Care Order: Hair Strand Testing) [2024] EWCA Civ 498

Max Melsa represented the children, through their Children’s Guardian, in the first case to reach the Court of Appeal specifically dealing with the interpretation of Hair-Strand Tests in care proceedings. The appeal was made by the mother against the interim separation of three children from…

Dekinar: Understanding the New Fixed Costs Regime for Cross-Border Claims

In this webinar, Thomas Yarrow and Anirudh Mandagere will take a look at the new fixed costs regime with a specific eye on its impacts on litigation with a cross-border element. Thomas and Anirudh will also answer any questions you may have on the issues…

Subscribe to our mailing list

Deka Chambers: 5 Norwich Street, London EC4A 1DR

© Deka Chambers 2024


Portfolio Builder

Select the expertise that you would like to download or add to the portfolio

Download    Add to portfolio   
Title Type CV Email

Remove All


Click here to share this shortlist.
(It will expire after 30 days.)