Inquest into Tunisia Terrorist Attack delayed until 2017

News

01/03/2016

The full hearing of the inquest into the deaths of 30 British people killed in a terrorist attack in Tunisia in June 2015 will start on 16th January 2017.

Andrew Ritchie QC is representing the families of sixteen of the victims and appeared at the High Court today for a pre-Inquest hearing today.

The families invited the coroner to consider how to prevent future deaths at tourist sites by reporting to authorities, recommending that holiday companies should be highlighting the risk of terrorism to potential holiday makers in a clear way that allowed them to make informed decisions when booking holidays. The families allege that TUI did not pass on Foreign Office advice to customers before the attack that warned of a “high threat from terrorism, including kidnapping. Attacks could be indiscriminate including places visited by foreigners.” Ritchie also highlighted that some customers were sold travel insurance by Thompson Holidays which did not cover cancellations related to the risk of a terror attack and customers who had booked were discouraged by Thompsons from cancelling potentially dangerous trips because their money would not be refunded.

Andrew Ritchie QC said: “They [the families] are very concerned that TUI (Thomson’s parent company) and the travel industry in England and Wales are still involved in a general practice which puts customers at risk by hiding or ignoring Foreign Office warnings in their brochures and booking forms.”

The inquest will look at what, if anything, the UK government and travel companies knew about the risk of an attack at the Mediterranean resort and the coroner will also consider security at the hotel and the “adequacy” of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office’s travel advice for the region.

Andrew Ritchie QC is instructed by Irwin Mitchell LLP.

For wider coverage of this case see:

Latest News & Events

Case summary: John v Jane [2026] EWHC 415 (Fam)

Much of children law involves the exploration of the facts relating to the child’s care and welfare, often coloured by the complex relationship dynamics between the adult protagonists. Occasionally, however, the facts which need to be established can be more fundamental.  In John v Jane…

Special Guardianship at the End of Care Proceedings: Threshold Still Matters

By Laura Hibberd Re E (A Child) (Special Guardianship Order: Public Law Proceedings) [2026] EWCA Civ 1167 Special guardianship orders are often thought of as the “middle ground” of permanence: more secure than a care order, less final than adoption, and with the child’s legal…

Case Summary: Re C (Child Arrangements Orders; Domestic Abuse; Child Focused Court) [2026] EWCA Civ 1216

By Tim Parker KC The President of the Family Division handed down judgment on 29th September 2026 the decision in the first appeal following the introduction of Child-Focused Courts pilot. In Re C (Child Arrangements Orders; Domestic Abuse; Child Focused Court) [2026] EWCA Civ 1216…

© Deka Chambers 2026

Search

Portfolio Builder

Select the expertise that you would like to download or add to the portfolio

Download    Add to portfolio   
Portfolio
Title Type CV Email

Remove All

Download


Click here to share this shortlist.
(It will expire after 30 days.)