While funeral expenses should be pleaded in all fatal accidents cases, Cyrus Katrak warns practitioners to beware of Brown –v- Hamid [2013] EWHC 4067 (QB). In that case the Defendant was found to have accelerated the Claimant’s pre-existing symptoms and death. The judge found that the period of acceleration was around 12 months.
When considering the claim for funeral expenses, the Judge noted: “However although damages for the recovery of funeral expenses “may” be recovered and indeed usually are recovered under s.3(5) of the 1976 Act, in the circumstances of this case, namely the acceleration of the symptoms associated with a pre-existing condition by a relatively short period of time, I do not consider that it would be appropriate to make such an award.”
I do not consider that this was a correct decision. We all die, so in a sense every Fatal Accident Claim is an accelerated death case. As to that period of acceleration, does death 1 day / 1 month / 1 year earlier prevent an award of funeral expenses? This seems completely arbitrary.
The Judge’s reasoning also seems at odds given that he awarded bereavement damages under the Fatal Accidents Act 1976.
There is also conflict on this point in respect of living Claimant’s whose life expectancy has been shortened. In Bateman v. Hydro Agri (UK) Ltd (September 15, 1995) a High Court judge held that funeral expenses were a valid claim. The claimant was suffering from mesothelioma and was likely to die within three months of the date of the trial.
However, in Watson –v- Cakebread Robey Ltd [2009] EWHC 1695 (QB) the Judge held that funeral expenses are not recoverable by a living claimant whose life expectancy was reduced by 9 months, although of course, once the Claimant died a claim could presumably have been brought under the Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1934.
Thus there is plenty of scope for Claimants to argue these points should they be raised by Defendants in their defence or at trial.
By Susanna Bennett The High Court decision of Burgess v Sikorski is novel because the court addressed for the first time whether professional deputyship fees were recoverable in a Fatal Accidents Act case in which two dependants were protected beneficiaries. The answer of Mr Justice…
We are pleased to share that Susanna Bennett has returned from parental leave and is available to take instructions. Susanna has a busy practice comprising civil claims and inquests concerning alleged failures in medical treatment, together with duty of care claims brought against employers, occupiers,…
This week Sarah Prager KC reports on the ongoing CMA investigation into drip pricing, and takes inspiration from a recent trip to the cinema to see The Odyssey when considering the ongoing EC review of the operation of the recast Brussels Regulation. The Competition and…
Deka Chambers: 5 Norwich Street, London EC4A 1DR