Stephen Glynn achieves settlement for claimant who was assaulted at school

News

10/05/2015

Stephen Glynn represented the claimant in the case of Lucy Pyett v. The London Borough of Merton QB March 2015.  Ms Pyett was seriously sexually assaulted by a number of other pupils at her state secondary school in south London in October 2010.  She was aged 14 at the time. 

The assault took place in the school toilets during first break and continued for about an hour until the school bell rang for lunch.  The toilet block was not patrolled or inspected by any of the school staff in contravention of the school’s policy and, moreover, Lucy’s teacher did not notice her absence in the lesson after the break or take any steps because of it. 

Lucy had to give evidence at the subsequent criminal trial against her attackers who were all sentenced to periods of imprisonment.  Lucy suffered serious psychiatric illness on top of the physical injuries suffered.  Her schooling was badly disrupted but despite this she obtained 4 GCSEs and 2 BTech qualifications.  These grades were much lower than had been expected of her before the assault.  She had previously been selected to be on the gifted and talented register and was otherwise a very able pupil before the assault.  Lucy has now managed to find work in a public house where her mother also works. 

As ever, in cases concerning children who are injured at a relatively young age, it was very difficult to prove what Lucy’s earnings would have been but for the assault.

The parties compromised the claim in the sum of £155,000.

Stephen Glynn was instructed by Sarah Towler of Russell Cooke LLP.

Featured Counsel

Stephen Glynn

Call 1990

Latest News & Events

The Dekagram: 20th May 2024

We trust that our readers have been enjoying the Spring sunshine; the team have spent their time in the sun wisely, reading cases so you don’t have to. First we noted a decision which considers the interplay between English and Scottish guardianship; secondly we read…

The Dekagram: 13th May 2024

Last week brought the news that the Australian airline Qantas and the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission have agreed to resolve their dispute over cancelled flights by asking the court to impose a $100 million fine, together with an undertaking by the airline to pay…

Max Melsa appears in Court of Appeal in Re D (Children: Interim Care Order: Hair Strand Testing) [2024] EWCA Civ 498

Max Melsa represented the children, through their Children’s Guardian, in the first case to reach the Court of Appeal specifically dealing with the interpretation of Hair-Strand Tests in care proceedings. The appeal was made by the mother against the interim separation of three children from…

Subscribe to our mailing list

Deka Chambers: 5 Norwich Street, London EC4A 1DR

© Deka Chambers 2024

Search

Portfolio Builder

Select the expertise that you would like to download or add to the portfolio

Download    Add to portfolio   
Portfolio
Title Type CV Email

Remove All

Download


Click here to share this shortlist.
(It will expire after 30 days.)